Habeas Corpus Resource Center et al v. United States Department of Justice et al
Filing
28
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 27 Stipulation for Briefing on Show Cause Order 26 . (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
STUART F. DELERY
Assistant Attorney General
MELINDA HAAG
United States Attorney
ANTHONY J. COPPOLINO
Deputy Branch Director
JACQUELINE COLEMAN SNEAD
Senior Counsel
United States Department of Justice
Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch
20 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W., Room 7214
Washington, DC 20001
Tel: (202) 514-3418
Fax: (202) 616-8470
Email: Jacqueline.snead@usdoj.gov
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
Habeas Corpus Resource Center and the
Office of the Federal Public Defender for
the District of Arizona,
Plaintiffs,
14
17
vs.
United States Department of Justice and
Eric H. Holder, in his official capacity as
United States Attorney General,
18
Defendants.
15
16
Case No.: CV 13-4517-CW
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Stipulation and Order for Briefing on
Show Cause Order
Date: November 14, 2013
Time: 2:00pm
Courtroom: 2
Judge: Claudia Wilken
19
Plaintiffs, Habeas Corpus Resource Center and the Office of the Federal Public
20
Defender for the District of Arizona (“Plaintiffs”), and Defendants, the Department of
21
Justice and Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General (“the government”), by
22
and through undersigned counsel, have conferred and agreed to the following stipulation:
23
1.
By order dated October 18, 2013, the Court set a briefing schedule for the
24
order to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue and indicated that the
25
parties could “stipulate to an alternate briefing schedule, including an extension of the
26
temporary restraining order” entered that day. Order Granting Pls.’ Application for a
27
Habeas Corpus Resource Ctr. v. Department of Justice
Case No. 13-4517
Stipulation of Parties re: Briefing Schedule
28
1
1
TRO & Order to Show Cause Why Prelim. Inj. Should Not Issue 9 (Oct. 18, 2013), ECF
2
No. 26.
3
2.
The parties have conferred and agreed to an alternate briefing schedule.
4
Subject to the approval of the Court, the government will file its response to the order to
5
show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue on November 4, 2013;
6
Plaintiffs will file their reply on November 11, 2013; and the hearing on Plaintiffs’
7
motion will be November 14, 2013 at 2:00pm.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
3.
The temporary restraining order entered October 18, 2013 shall be extended
for an additional 14 days and accordingly shall expire on November 15, 2013.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Date: October 23, 2013
Respectfully submitted,
STUART F. DELERY
Assistant Attorney General
MELINDA HAAG
U.S. Attorney
ANTHONY J. COPPOLINO
Deputy Branch Director
Civil Division
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
/s/ Jacqueline Coleman Snead
JACQUELINE COLEMAN SNEAD
(D.C. Bar 459548)
Senior Counsel
United States Department of Justice
Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch
20 Massachusetts Ave, NW
Washington, D.C. 20530
Telephone: (202) 514-3418
Fax: (202) 616-8470
E-mail: Jacqueline.Snead@usdoj.gov
26
27
Counsel for Defendants
Habeas Corpus Resource Ctr. v. Department of Justice
Case No. 13-4517
Stipulation of Parties re: Briefing Schedule
28
2
1
2
Date: October 23, 2013
Respectfully submitted,
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
3
4
/s/ Darren S. Teshima
DARREN S. TESHIMA (State Bar No.
238875)
The Orrick Building
405 Howard Street
San Francisco, CA 94105-2669
Telephone: (415) 773-5700
Fax: (415) 773-5759
E-mail: dteshima@orrick.com
5
6
7
8
9
10
Counsel for Plaintiffs
11
ORDER
12
13
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
Date: 10/24/2013
____________________________
Honorable Claudia Wilken
United States District Court Judge
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Habeas Corpus Resource Ctr. v. Department of Justice
Case No. 13-4517
Stipulation of Parties re: Briefing Schedule
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?