Habeas Corpus Resource Center et al v. United States Department of Justice et al

Filing 62

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 61 Stipulation TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2014)

1
2
3
4
5

GEORGE E. GREER (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
DARREN S. TESHIMA (STATE BAR NO. 238875)
[e-mail]
CATHERINE Y. LUI (STATE BAR NO. 239648)
[e-mail]
MARC R. SHAPIRO (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
SHANNON C. LEONG (STATE BAR NO. 268612)
[e-mail]

6
7
8
9

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
The Orrick Building
405 Howard Street
San Francisco California 94105-2669
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

10
11

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Habeas Corpus Resource Center and the Office of the
Federal Public Defender for the District of Arizona

12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15
16
17

Habeas Corpus Resource Center and the Office
of the Federal Public Defender for the District
of Arizona,

18

Plaintiffs,

19
20
21
22

Case No. 4:13-cv-4517
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING
SCHEDULE

v.
United States Department of Justice and Eric
H. Holder, in his official capacity as United
States Attorney General,
Defendants.

23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
CASE NO. 13-4517

1

Plaintiffs Habeas Corpus Resource Center and the Office of the Federal Public Defender

2

for the District of Arizona (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), and Defendants, the Department of Justice

3

and Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General (collectively, “Defendants”), by and

4

through their counsel, have conferred and agreed to the following stipulation:

5

1.

On January 21, 2013, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Fifth Cause

6

of Action. The parties initially agreed that Plaintiffs would file their opposition on February 27,

7

2014, and Defendants would file their reply on March 20, 2014.

8

2.

The parties have conferred and agreed to extend these deadlines so that the parties

9

may continue discussing alternative options related to the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, which

10

may moot the Defendants’ Motion. Accordingly, subject to the approval of the Court, Plaintiffs

11

will file their opposition on March 5, 2014, and Defendants will file their reply on March 27,

12

2014.

13

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

14

Respectfully submitted,

15
16
17
18
19

Dated: February 26, 2014

GEORGE E. GREER
CATHERINE Y. LUI
DARREN S. TESHIMA
MARC R. SHAPIRO
SHANNON C. LEONG
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

20
21

By:

22

/s/ Catherine Y. Lui
CATHERINE Y. LUI
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
CASE NO. 13-4517

1
2
3

Dated: February 26, 2014

STUART F. DELERY
MELINDA HAAG
ANTHONY J. COPPOLINO
JACQUELINE COLEMAN SNEAD
United States Department of Justice

4
By:
5

/s/ Jacqueline Coleman Snead____
JACQUELINE COLEMAN SNEAD
Attorneys for Defendants

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
CASE NO. 13-4517

1
2
3
4

PROPOSED ORDER
Pursuant to the stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

The hearing is continued to
April 10, 2014, at 2:00 p.m., or by stipulation to a later Thursday on which the Court is
available.
2/28/2014
Date: ____________________

________________________________
Honorable Claudia Wilken
United States District Court Judge

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
CASE NO. 13-4517