Habeas Corpus Resource Center et al v. United States Department of Justice et al
Filing
62
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 61 Stipulation TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
GEORGE E. GREER (admitted pro hac vice)
ggreer@orrick.com
DARREN S. TESHIMA (STATE BAR NO. 238875)
dteshima@orrick.com
CATHERINE Y. LUI (STATE BAR NO. 239648)
clui@orrick.com
MARC R. SHAPIRO (admitted pro hac vice)
mshapiro@orrick.com
SHANNON C. LEONG (STATE BAR NO. 268612)
sleong@orrick.com
6
7
8
9
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
The Orrick Building
405 Howard Street
San Francisco California 94105-2669
Telephone:
+1-415-773-5700
Facsimile:
+1-415-773-5759
10
11
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Habeas Corpus Resource Center and the Office of the
Federal Public Defender for the District of Arizona
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
Habeas Corpus Resource Center and the Office
of the Federal Public Defender for the District
of Arizona,
18
Plaintiffs,
19
20
21
22
Case No. 4:13-cv-4517
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING
SCHEDULE
v.
United States Department of Justice and Eric
H. Holder, in his official capacity as United
States Attorney General,
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
CASE NO. 13-4517
1
Plaintiffs Habeas Corpus Resource Center and the Office of the Federal Public Defender
2
for the District of Arizona (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), and Defendants, the Department of Justice
3
and Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General (collectively, “Defendants”), by and
4
through their counsel, have conferred and agreed to the following stipulation:
5
1.
On January 21, 2013, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Fifth Cause
6
of Action. The parties initially agreed that Plaintiffs would file their opposition on February 27,
7
2014, and Defendants would file their reply on March 20, 2014.
8
2.
The parties have conferred and agreed to extend these deadlines so that the parties
9
may continue discussing alternative options related to the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, which
10
may moot the Defendants’ Motion. Accordingly, subject to the approval of the Court, Plaintiffs
11
will file their opposition on March 5, 2014, and Defendants will file their reply on March 27,
12
2014.
13
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
14
Respectfully submitted,
15
16
17
18
19
Dated: February 26, 2014
GEORGE E. GREER
CATHERINE Y. LUI
DARREN S. TESHIMA
MARC R. SHAPIRO
SHANNON C. LEONG
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
20
21
By:
22
/s/ Catherine Y. Lui
CATHERINE Y. LUI
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
CASE NO. 13-4517
1
2
3
Dated: February 26, 2014
STUART F. DELERY
MELINDA HAAG
ANTHONY J. COPPOLINO
JACQUELINE COLEMAN SNEAD
United States Department of Justice
4
By:
5
/s/ Jacqueline Coleman Snead____
JACQUELINE COLEMAN SNEAD
Attorneys for Defendants
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
CASE NO. 13-4517
1
2
3
4
PROPOSED ORDER
Pursuant to the stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.
The hearing is continued to
April 10, 2014, at 2:00 p.m., or by stipulation to a later Thursday on which the Court is
available.
2/28/2014
Date: ____________________
________________________________
Honorable Claudia Wilken
United States District Court Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
CASE NO. 13-4517
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?