Zelinsky v. Kaplan et al
Filing
20
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 15 Report and Recommendations regarding remanding case; ORDER REMANDING CASE to Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 11/21/13. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2013)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
LALEH S. ZELINSKY,
9
Plaintiff,
10
Northern District of California
United States District Court
11
12
13
vs.
Case No.: 13-cv-04586-YGR
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND
REMANDING ACTION TO SUPERIOR COURT
OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
DAVID KAPLAN, et al.,
Defendants.
14
15
The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Spero’s Report and Recommendation Regarding
16
Order to Show Cause (“Report”), wherein he recommends that this action be remanded to the
17
Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco. (Dkt. No. 15.) No party has filed an objection
18
to the Report. The Court finds the Report to be correct, well-reasoned, and thorough, and hereby
19
ADOPTS it in every respect.
20
Accordingly, and for the reasons set forth in the Report, the above-captioned action is
21
REMANDED to the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco. The Clerk of this Court is
22
further ordered to forward certified copies of this Order and all docket entries to the Clerk of the San
23
Francisco County Superior Court.
24
This Order terminates Dkt. No. 15.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
28
Date: November 21, 2013
_______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?