Zelinsky v. Kaplan et al

Filing 20

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 15 Report and Recommendations regarding remanding case; ORDER REMANDING CASE to Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 11/21/13. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 LALEH S. ZELINSKY, 9 Plaintiff, 10 Northern District of California United States District Court 11 12 13 vs. Case No.: 13-cv-04586-YGR ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND REMANDING ACTION TO SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO DAVID KAPLAN, et al., Defendants. 14 15 The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Spero’s Report and Recommendation Regarding 16 Order to Show Cause (“Report”), wherein he recommends that this action be remanded to the 17 Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco. (Dkt. No. 15.) No party has filed an objection 18 to the Report. The Court finds the Report to be correct, well-reasoned, and thorough, and hereby 19 ADOPTS it in every respect. 20 Accordingly, and for the reasons set forth in the Report, the above-captioned action is 21 REMANDED to the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco. The Clerk of this Court is 22 further ordered to forward certified copies of this Order and all docket entries to the Clerk of the San 23 Francisco County Superior Court. 24 This Order terminates Dkt. No. 15. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Date: November 21, 2013 _______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?