Purdum et al v. Wolfe

Filing 67

ORDER GRANTING AS MODIFIED 65 STIPULATION TO CHANGE HEARING DATE ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND THE AMENDED COMPLAINT. Motion Hearing set for 7/31/2014 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Signed by Judge Donna M. Ryu on 6/16/14. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/16/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DARREN S. ENENSTEIN (SBN 195894) Email: dse@enensteinlaw.com MICHAEL T. ROSENTHAL (SBN 206552) Email: mrosenthal@enensteinlaw.com ENENSTEIN & RIBAKOFF, APC 233 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 400 Santa Monica, California 90401 Phone: (310) 899-2070 Fax: (310) 496-1930 LEE B. SZOR (SBN 276381) Email: lszor@vernonlawgroup.com THE VERNON LAW GROUP, PLLC 1040 Greenwich St., Suite 5 San Francisco, California 94133 Phone: (415) 630-5701 Attorneys for Defendant David Wolfe 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 15 BARRETT PURDUM, MICHAEL MAHER, and MICHAEL ARMENTA, 16 [proposed] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST TO CHANGE THE HEARING DATE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND THE AMENDED COMPLAINT AS MODIFIED Plaintiffs, 17 Case No.: 4:13-cv-04816-DMR vs. 18 DAVID WOLFE, 19 Defendant. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 This Court, having carefully reviewed and considered the parties’ Stipulated Request to 2 Change the Hearing Date for Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave To Amend the Amended Complaint, 3 hereby ORDERS: 4 5 Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Amend the Amended Complaint (Rec. Doc. 60) shall be heard July 31, 2014 on June 26, 2014 at 11:00 a.m. at The Oakland Courthouse, Courtroom 4, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland 6 California 94612. The former hearing date of July 10, 2014 shall be taken off calendar. 7 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 10 June 16, 2014 Dated: _____________________ United States Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?