Cato v. Colvin

Filing 20

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 19 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Requesting Extension of Time to File Motion for Summary Judgment/Plaintiff to Retain New Counsel filed by Carolyn W. Colvin, Theresa M. Cato. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 5/20/14. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2014)

Download PDF
1 HARVEY P. SACKETT (72488) 2 3 4 5 6 1055 Lincoln Avenue Post Office Box 5025 San Jose, California 95150-5025 Telephone: (408) 295-7755 Facsimile: (408) 295-7444 7 8 Attorney for Plaintiff 9 /jgl 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 OAKLAND DIVISION 14 15 THERESA M. CATO, 16 Plaintiff, 17 v. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant. ) Case No: 4:13-cv-04889 KAW ) ) ) ) STIPULATION AND ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate that: (1) Plaintiff shall have a third and final extension of time of forty-five days up through and including Thursday, July 3, 2014 in which to e-file her Motion for Summary Judgment; and (2) Defendant shall file any opposition, including cross-motions, on or before July 31, 2014. This extension is necessitated by the need for Plaintiff to retain new counsel, and the concomitant time required to become familiar with the case, and prepare Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. 28 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER 1 All deadlines will be extended accordingly. 2 MELINDA L. HAAG United States Attorney 3 4 5 Dated: May 16, 2014 /s/ SUSAN L. SMITH Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Social Security Administration Attorney for the Defendant Dated: May 16, 2014 /s/ HARVEY P. SACKETT Attorney for Plaintiff THERESA M. CATO 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 16 Dated: 5/20/14 HON. KANDIS A. WESTMORE United States Magistrate Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?