Nobles et al v. Coco-Cola Refreshments USA Inc et al

Filing 43

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Show Cause Response due by 12/11/2015. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 11/24/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/24/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES D D DISTRICT C COURT 5 NORTHER DISTRIC OF CALI RN CT IFORNIA 6 8 IN RE COCA N A-COLA PRO ODUCTS MARKETING AND SAL PRACT M G LES TICES LI ITIGATION (II) N Case No. 1 14-md-02555-JSW This document relates to o: 7 ORDER T SHOW C TO CAUSE 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 Nobles v. Coc N ca-Cola Refr reshments USA, US In 13-cv-50 nc., 017-JSW Ra ankin v. Coc ca-Cola Com mpany, et al., 14-cv42 274-JSW 13 14 15 ourt ived Defend dants’ motion for summa judgment In that mo n ary t. otion, The Co has recei 16 De efendants con ntend that Pl laintiffs Mar Rankin an Ayanna N ry nd Nobles have not responde to ed 17 dis scovery requ uests. Althou Defenda assert th Plaintiffs have repres ugh ants hat sented that th hese actions 18 wil be discontinued, Plaintiffs have no dismissed the actions. In addition Plaintiffs h ll ot n, have not 19 dis sputed the as ssertion that Ms. Rankin and Ms. No obles failed t respond to discovery r to o requests. 20 Accord dingly, Ms. Rankin and Ms. Nobles a HEREBY ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE R M are Y W 21 as to why their complaints should not be dismissed for failure t prosecute Ms. Noble and Ms. t r b d to e. e’s 22 Ran nkin’s respo onses to this Order to Sho Cause sh be due b no later th Decembe 11, 2015. ow hall by han er 23 Fai ilure to file a timely resp ponse to this Order to Sh how Cause sh result in dismissal o their hall n of 24 cla aims without prejudice. t 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDER S RED. Da ated: Novem mber 24, 2015 5 _____ __________ ___________ __________ _ JEF FFREY S. W WHITE Un nited States D District Judg ge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?