Hartford Casualty Insurance Company v. LEOGAP
Filing
16
ORDER REOPENING CASE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 08/14/2015. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
8
9
ORDER RE-OPENING CASE
v.
10
LEOGAP,
11
12
Defendant.
On September 23, 2014, the court administratively closed this case for statistical purposes
13
in light of Plaintiff Hartford Casualty Insurance Company’s representation that service of the
14
summons and complaint on Defendant LEOGAP in Brazil could take up to two years. On August
15
11, 2015, Defendant LEOGAP appeared in this action and filed an answer to the complaint.
16
Therefore, it is hereby ordered that the Clerk shall re-open this case.
17
24
25
26
27
28
S
ER
H
23
R NIA
FO
RT
22
. Ryu
onna M
Judge D
NO
21
D
RDERE
OO
______________________________________
IT IS S
Donna M. Ryu
United States Magistrate Judge
LI
20
Dated: August 14, 2015
A
19
IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNIT
ED
18
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 13-cv-05076-DMR
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?