EJT Technologies Inc. v. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. et al
Filing
25
ORDER of dismissal. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 4/2/2014. (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2014)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
6
EJT TECHNOLOGIES INC.,
7
Plaintiff,
No. C 13-5112 PJH
8
v.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
9
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., et al.,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
Defendants.
_______________________________/
The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the court that they have agreed
13
to a settlement of this cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed
14
without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto shall certify to this court,
15
within sixty (60) days, with proof of service on the opposing party thereof, that the agreed
16
consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order shall
17
stand vacated and this action shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial.
18
If no certification is filed, after passage of sixty (60) days, the dismissal shall be with
19
prejudice. The parties may substitute a dismissal with prejudice at any time during this
20
sixty-day period.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 2, 2014
______________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?