United States of America v. $156,960 In United States Currency et al
Filing
21
JUDGMENT. ***Civil Case Terminated.*** Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 1/21/2014. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2014)
1 MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612)
United States Attorney
2
J. DOUGLAS WILSON (DCBN 412811)
3 Chief, Criminal Division
4 STEPHANIE M. HINDS (CABN 154284)
Assistant United States Attorney
5
450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055
San Francisco, California 94102-3495
6
Telephone: (415) 436-7200
FAX: (415) 436-7234
7
E-Mail: stephanie.hinds@usdoj.gov
8
Attorneys for Plaintiff
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
OAKLAND DIVISION
12
13
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
) NO. CV 13-5139 SBA
)
)
JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
v.
APPROXIMATELY $156,960 IN UNITED
STATES CURRENCY, ET AL,
17
Defendants.
18
SCOT RAYMOND COMBS,
19
Claimant.
20
21
22
UPON CONSIDERATION of the Settlement Agreement, the entire record, and for good cause
23
shown, it is by the Court on this 21st day of January, 2014,
24
ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the following defendant funds:
25
26
$156,960 in United States Currency
$16,862.15 in funds seized from US Bank, Acct No xxxxxxxx2648
27
$8,698.51 in funds seized from Chase Bank Acct No xxxxx7180
28
$7,993.05 in funds seized from Bank of America Acct No xxxxxxxx2981
CV 13-5139 SBA
JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE
1
1
2
3
4
$4,957.43 in funds seized from Union Bank Acct No xxxxxx6307
be, and hereby is, FORFEITED to the United States for disposition by the Attorney General in
accordance with the law; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that the instant case be, and hereby is,
DISMISSED.
5
SAUNDRA B. ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CV 13-5139 SBA
JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?