Technology Licensing Corporation v. Blackmagic Design Pty Ltd.
Filing
69
ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong 68 Stipulated SUPPLEMENTAL [PROPOSED]CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER(terminating 65 Stipulation) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
Martin L. Fineman, Bar No. 104413
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 276-6575
Facsimile: (415) 276-6599
Email: martinfineman@dwt.com
NIRO HALLER & NIRO
Raymond P. Niro
(Member of the N.D. Cal. Bar)
rniro@nshn.com
Joseph N. Hosteny (pro hac vice)
jhosteny@hosteny.com
Arthur A. Gasey (pro hac vice)
(gasey@nshn.com)
181 West Madison Street, Suite 4600
Chicago, Illinois 60602
Telephone: (312) 236 – 0733
Facsimile: (312) 236 – 3137
Gregory L. Lippetz (State Bar No. 154228)
glippetz@jonesday.com
Kathleen D. Lynott (State Bar No. 268387)
kdlynott@jonesday.com
JONES DAY
Silicon Valley Office
1755 Embarcadero Road
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Telephone: (650) 739-3939
Facsimile: (650) 739-3900
Attorneys for Defendant
BLACKMAGIC DESIGN PTY LTD.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
TECHNOLOGY LICENSING CORP.
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
OAKLAND DIVISION
16
17
TECHNOLOGY LICENSING CORP.,
Plaintiff,
18
19
20
21
Case No. 4:13-CV-05184 SBA
SUPPLEMENTAL [PROPOSED]
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
v.
BLACKMAGIC DESIGN PTY LTD.,
Defendant.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-
SUPPLEMENTAL [PROPOSED] CM ORDER
NO. 3:12-CV-06060-VC (PSG)
1
Pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties to the above-
2
entitled action jointly submit this Supplemental [Proposed] Case Management Order to amend
3
certain case deadlines (ECF Nos. 59, 61, and 63 ). The parties have met and conferred regarding
4
the sufficiency of Technology Licensing Corporation’s (“TLC”) Infringement Contentions,
5
served on March 6, 2014. Without agreeing that its present contentions are insufficient, and
6
therefore as a compromise, TLC has agreed to amend its contentions, and to serve Amended
7
Infringement Contentions on July 14, 2014. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to amend
8
deadlines triggered by service of infringement contentions per the Patent Local Rules.
9
Additionally, to facilitate constructive mediation, the parties request that the Court extend the
10
ADR deadline to September 1, 2014 so that representatives with settlement authority from each
11
party may attend.
12
13
Current Deadline
None
Proposed Deadline
July 14, 2014
14
May 21, 2014
August 4, 2014
18
20
21
June 9, 2014
August 18, 2014
Exchange of Proposed Terms for Construction.
(PLR 4-1).
June 30, 2014
September 1, 2014
ADR Deadline
June 30, 2014
September 8, 2014
Exchange of Preliminary Claim Construction and
Extrinsic Evidence. (PLR 4-2).
July 21, 2014
October 3, 2014
File Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing
Statement. (PLR 4-3).
August 20, 2014
November 2, 2014
Close of Claim Construction discovery. (PLR-44).
September 4, 2014
November 17, 2014
Opening claim construction brief due. (PLR 4-5).
September 22, 2014
December 1, 2014
Responsive claim construction brief due.
(PLR 4-5)
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Serve “Invalidity Contentions.” (PLR 3-3).
Produce documents to accompany “Invalidity
Contentions.” (PLR 3-4).
17
19
Serve Amended “Disclosure of Asserted Claims
and Infringement Contentions.” (PLR 3-1).
Produce any additional documents to accompany
contentions. (PLR 3-2).
15
16
Event
-2-
SUPPLEMENTAL [PROPOSED] CM ORDER
NO. 3:12-CV-06060-VC (PSG)
1
2
October 2, 2014
December 8, 2014
Reply claim construction brief due. (PLR 4-5)
October 17, 2014
December 12, 2014
2 Binders of each side’s presentation slides for
Claim construction hearing due.
October 23, 2014 at
10 AM
December 16, 2014
at 10 AM
Claim Construction Hearing (PLR 4-6)
50 days after the
50 days after the
Court’s service of
Court’s service of
Advice of counsel defense discovery due. (PLR
3-7).
the claim
construction ruling
the claim
construction ruling
TBD
TBD
Fact Discovery Cut-off
TBD
TBD
Designation of Opening Experts with Reports
TBD
TBD
Designation of Rebuttal Experts with Reports
TBD
TBD
Expert Discovery Cut-off
TBD
TBD
Dispositive motions and motions re experts due.
TBD
TBD
Pretrial Conference
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Dated:
June 17, 2014
Respectfully submitted,
18
JONES DAY
19
By:
20
/s/ Gregory L. Lippetz
Gregory L. Lippetz
21
Attorneys for Defendant
BLACKMAGIC DESIGN PTY LTD.
22
NIRO, HALLER & NIRO
23
By:
24
25
26
/s/ Joseph N. Hosteny
Joseph N. Hosteny
Attorneys for Plaintiff
TECHNOLOGY LICENSING
CORPORATION
27
28
-3-
SUPPLEMENTAL [PROPOSED] CM ORDER
NO. 3:12-CV-06060-VC (PSG)
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
6/17/2014
Dated: ________________________
3
________________________________
HON. SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-
SUPPLEMENTAL [PROPOSED] CM ORDER
NO. 3:12-CV-06060-VC (PSG)
1
2
ATTESTATION
I, Kathleen D. Lynott, an ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
3
SUPPLEMENTAL [PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER, in compliance with Civil
4
L.R. 5-1(i)(3), hereby attest that Joseph N. Hosteny, attorney for Technology Licensing Corp.,
5
has concurred with this filing.
6
7
8
9
10
Dated June 17, 2014
By:
/s/ Kathleen D. Lynott
Kathleen D. Lynott
Attorneys for Defendant
BLACKMAGIC DESIGN PTY LTD.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-5-
SUPPLEMENTAL [PROPOSED] CM ORDER
NO. 3:12-CV-06060-VC (PSG)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?