Hatfield et al v. DaVita Healthcare Partners, Inc.

Filing 26

ORDER signed on 6/26/2014 by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong Granting 25 Stipulation for an Extension of Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/27/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 VINCENT M. SPOHN, Bar No. 09334 vms@vspohnlaw.com LAW OFFICES OF VINCENT M. SPOHN, A.P.C. 1005 Jefferson Street Napa, CA 94559.0748 Telephone: 707.255.1885 Facsimile: 707.255.0974 Attorney for Plaintiffs SANDRA HATFIELD, LAUREL ANTONUCCI, and MAUREEN PATRICIA MURPHY THEODORA R. LEE, Bar No. 129892 tlee@littler.com KAI-CHING CHA, Bar No. 218738 kcha@littler.com ALEXIS A. SOHRAKOFF, Bar No. 273410 asohrakoff@littler.com LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street, 20th Floor San Francisco, California 94108.2693 Telephone: 415.433.1940 Facsimile: 415.399.8490 Attorneys for Defendant RENAL TREATMENT CENTERS – CALIFORNIA, INC., erroneously sued as DaVITA HEALTHCARE PARTNERS INC. 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 19 20 SANDRA HATFIELD, an individual; LAUREL ANTONUCCI, an individual; and MAUREEN PATRICIA MURPHY, an individual, 21 Case No. 13-CV-05206 SBA STIPULATION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS’ TO RESPOND TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiffs, Dept.: Judge: 22 v. Courtroom 1 - 4th Floor Hon. Saundra B. Armstrong 23 24 25 DaVITA HEALTHCARE PARTNERS, INC.; and Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Complaint Filed: October 4, 2013 Defendant. 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 415.433.1940 STIP. FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFT'S TO RESPOND TO FAC CASE NO. 13-CV-05206 SBA 1 Plaintiffs Sandra Hatfield, Laurel Antonucci and Maureen Patricia Murphy 2 (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Renal Treatment Centers – California, Inc., erroneously sued as DaVita 3 Healthcare Partners Inc. (“Defendant”), by and through its respective counsel of record, hereby 4 stipulate and agree as follows: 5 6 7 8 9 1. WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their Complaint in the Superior Court of the State of California in Napa County on October 4, 2013; 2. WHEREAS, Defendant timely removed the action and filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 12(b)(6); 3. WHEREAS, this Court granted Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ 10 Complaint with leave to amend and ordered Plaintiffs to file their First Amended Complaint 11 consistent with the Court’s rulings by June 9, 2014 and to meet and confer regarding the sufficiency 12 of Plaintiffs’ amended allegations; 13 14 15 4. WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Complaint on June 9, 2014 and Defendant’s first responsive pleading is due Thursday, June 26, 2014; 5. WHEREAS, this Court requires the parties to meet and confer prior to the 16 filing of any noticed motion and Defendant informed Plaintiffs that it considers the factual 17 allegations in Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint insufficient to satisfy the pleading requirements of 18 FRCP Rule 8(a)(2), intends to file a second Motion to Dismiss pursuant to FRCP Rule 12(b)(6), and 19 invited Plaintiffs to meet and confer regarding the sufficiency of their amended allegations; 20 6. WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to stipulate to extending the deadline for 21 Defendant to respond to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint to July 10, 2014 to give the parties 22 time to meet and confer and to give Plaintiffs the opportunity to file a Second Amended Complaint; 23 THEREFORE, 24 Pursuant to Rule 6-1(a) of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the 25 Northern District of California, the Parties hereby stipulate: (1) to extend the deadline for Defendant 26 to respond to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint to July 10, 2014; (2) to allow Plaintiffs to file a 27 Second Amended Complaint by July 10, 2014 if they so choose following the parties’ meet and 28 confer; and (3) in the event Plaintiffs’ file a Second Amended Complaint on July 10, 2014, LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 415.433.1940 STIP. FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFT'S TO RESPOND TO FAC 1. CASE NO. 13-CV-05206 SBA 1 Defendant’s deadline to file an Answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ Second Amended 2 Complaint shall be in accordance with applicable Rules in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 3 and/or the Northern District Court’s Local Rules. 4 5 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: June 26, 2014 /s/ Kai-Ching Cha KAI-CHING CHA LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant RENAL TREATMENT CENTERS – CALIFORNIA, INC., erroneously sued as DAVITA HEALTHCARE PARTNERS INC. Dated: June 26, 2014 /s/ Vincent M. Spohn VINCENT M. SPOHN LAW OFFICES OF VINCENT M. SPOHN, A.P.C. Attorney for Plaintiffs SANDRA HATFIELD, LAUREL ANTONUCCI, and MAUREEN PATRICIA MURPHY 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 415.433.1940 STIP. FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFT'S TO RESPOND TO FAC 2. CASE NO. 13-CV-05206 SBA 1 ORDER 2 The Court, having considered the Parties’ stipulation, hereby grant the parties' 3 request: (1) to extend the deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint 4 to July 10, 2014; (2) to allow Plaintiffs’ to file a Second Amended Complaint by July 10, 2014 if 5 they so choose following the parties’ meet and confer; and (3) in the event Plaintiffs to file a Second 6 Amended Complaint by July 10, 2014, then the deadline for Defendant to file its Answer or 7 otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint shall be in accordance with applicable 8 Rules in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and/or the Northern District Court’s Local Rules. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 Dated: 6/26/2014 HONORABLE SAUNDRA B. ARMSTRONG United States District Court Judge 12 13 Firmwide:127659917.1 068812.1015 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 415.433.1940 STIP. FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFT'S TO RESPOND TO FAC 3. CASE NO. 13-CV-05206 SBA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?