C. v. Sutter Medical Center of Santa Rosa et al

Filing 32

ORDER DISMISSING CASE, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 7/10/14. (nahS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 DONAHUE & HORROW, LLP 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 JORDAN CAZAREZ, a minor, by and through his Guardian ad Litem, Beatriz Estrada, 14 Plaintiff, 15 16 17 18 19 20 vs. Case No.: CV 13-5232 PJH [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL AND REQUEST TO TAKE THE FURTHER TELEPHONIC CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE OFF CALENDAR UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; ALLIANCE MEDICAL CENTER; SUTTER MEDICAL CENTER OF SANTA ROSA; JEFFREY E. MECKLER, FURTHER TELEPHONIC CMC: M.D.; PATRICIA E. PIERSOL, C.N.M.; Date: July 10, 2014 and DOES 1 THROUGH 50, inclusive, Time: 1:45 p.m. Courtroom: 3 Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 /// 27 /// 28 CV 13-5232 PJH –1– [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL AND REQUEST TO TAKE FURTHER TELEPHONIC CMC OFF CALENDAR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Plaintiff’s Request to dismiss this action, including Defendants UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; ALLIANCE MEDICAL CENTER; SUTTER MEDICAL CENTER OF SANTA ROSA; JEFFREY E. MECKLER, M.D.; PATRICIA E. PIERSOL, C.N.M.; and DOES 1 THROUGH 50, inclusive, without prejudice is hereby granted. Plaintiff’s Request to take the Further Telephonic Case Management Conference scheduled for July 10, 2014 at 1:45 p.m. is hereby granted. 8 12 amilton LI A H ER R NIA yllis J. H Judge Ph ED FO S RT 11 ORDER IT IS SO NO DONAHUE & HORROW, LLP 10 S DISTRICT TE C TA _______________________________ Honorable Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton Judge, United States District Court RT U O 10 DATED: July ____, 2014 UNIT ED 9 N F D IS T IC T O R C 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CV 13-5232 PJH –2– [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL AND REQUEST TO TAKE FURTHER TELEPHONIC CMC OFF CALENDAR

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?