Adamson v. City of San Francisco et al

Filing 40

ORDER DISMISSING DOE DEFENDANTS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 12/17/14. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
LORENZO ADAMSON,

12
13

Plaintiff(s),

No. C-13-05233 DMR
ORDER DISMISSING DOE
DEFENDANTS

v.

14

CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ET AL,

15

Defendant(s).
___________________________________/

16
17

On October 29, 2014, the court held a case management conference and ordered that the

18

deadline for Plaintiff to amend the pleadings to name the Doe Defendants was November 12, 2014.

19

[Docket No. 36.] Plaintiff failed to amend the pleadings by that deadline. On December 2, 2014,

20

the court issued an order to show cause stating that “[t]o date, no amended complaint has been filed.

21

By December 5, 2014, Plaintiff shall respond to this order to show cause for why the court should

22

not dismiss the Doe Defendants.” [Docket No. 38.]

23
24
25
26

To date, Plaintiff has neither filed an amended complaint nor responded to the court’s order
show cause. Accordingly, the Doe Defendants are dismissed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 17, 2014

27
28

DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge