Olivers Apparel, LLC v. Purdum et al

Filing 34

ORDER re Amendment of Pleadings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 03/26/2014. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 BARRETT PURDUM ET AL, 12 No. C-13-04816 DMR No. C-13-05284 DMR Plaintiffs, ORDER RE AMENDMENT OF PLEADINGS 13 v. 14 DAVID WOLFE, 15 Defendant. ___________________________________/ 16 OLIVERS APPAREL, LLC, 17 Plaintiff, 18 v. 19 BARRETT PURDUM ET AL, 20 21 Defendants. ___________________________________/ 22 23 In formulating the court’s case management plan for Purdum et al. v. Wolfe, No. 13-4816 24 DMR, and Olivers Apparel, LLC v. Purdum et al., No. 13-5284 DMR, the court assumed that one 25 outcome of the first trial would be a determination of the parties’ ownership interests in Olivers 26 Apparel, LLC and its assets. However, as the parties’ claims are currently pled, it is unclear what 27 causes of action and remedies will lead to a determination of the parties’ ownership interests. 28 1 Therefore, the parties must address these issues in their pleadings by May 23, 2014, the deadline set 2 by the court to amend the pleadings. 7 NO RT 8 10 11 For the Northern District of California ER H 9 United States District Court . Ryu DONNA M.ge Donna M RYU Jud United States Magistrate Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 R NIA Dated: March 26, 2014 A 6 DERED O OR IT IS S FO 5 LI UNIT ED IT IS SO ORDERED. S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 4 S 3 N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?