Steiner et al v. OneWest Bank F.S.B. et al

Filing 33

ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong Granting 27 Stipulation re 23 Amended Complaint (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2014)

1
2
3
4

Scott E. Brady, Esq. (IN #30534-49)
(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Schuckit & Associates, P.C.
4545 Northwestern Drive
Zionsville, IN 46077
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]

5
Lead Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC
6

10

Monica Katz-Lapides, Esq. (CSB #267231)
Tate &th
Associates
1321 8 Street, Suite 4
Berkeley, CA 94710
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]

11

Local Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC

7
8
9

12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

OAKLAND DIVISION

16
17
18
19
20
21

RICHARD A. STEINER and CAROLE J.
STEINER,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
ONEWEST BANK, FSB and
TRANS UNION, LLC,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 4:13-cv-05349-SBA
STIPULATION AND ORDER AS
TO PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT [Doc
No. 23]

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Plaintiffs Richard A. Steiner and Carole J. Steiner, by counsel, and Defendant Trans
Union, LLC (“Trans Union”), by counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
1.

That Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 23] (the “Amended

Complaint”) contains no new allegations directed against Trans Union.
2.

That, as a result, Trans Union is not required to file a response to the Amended

Complaint.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AS TO PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [DOC NO. 23] –
4:13-CV-05349-SBA
Page 1 of 3

1
2
3
4

3.

That Trans Union’s Answer To Plaintiff’s Complaint And Affirmative Defenses

[Doc. No. 15] shall be deemed its response to the Amended Complaint.
4.

That any new allegations of the Amended Complaint that could be read as being

directed against Trans Union shall be deemed denied.
Respectfully submitted,

5
6
7

Date: January 31, 2014

8
9
10
11
12

Counsel for Plaintiffs Richard A. Steiner
and Carole J. Steiner

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

s/ Mark F. Anderson (with consent)
Mark F. Anderson, Esq.
Anderson, Ogilvie & Brewer, LLP
235 Montgomery Street, Suite 914
San Francisco, CO 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]

Date: February 3, 2014

s/ Scott E. Brady
Scott E. Brady, Esq. (IN #30534-49)
(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Schuckit & Associates, P.C.
4545 Northwestern Drive
Zionsville, IN 46077
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Lead Counsel for Defendant Trans Union,
LLC
Monica Katz-Lapides, Esq. (CSB #267231)
Tate &th
Associates
1321 8 Street, Suite 4
Berkeley, CA 94710
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Local Counsel for Defendant Trans Union,
LLC
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest
that concurrence in the filing of this
document has been obtained from each of
the Signatories.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AS TO PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [DOC NO. 23] –
4:13-CV-05349-SBA
Page 2 of 3

1

ORDER

2

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that Trans Union’s Answer To

3

Plaintiff’s Complaint And Affirmative Defenses [Doc. No. 15] shall be deemed its response to

4

the Amended Complaint any new allegations of the Amended Complaint that could be read as

5

being directed against Trans Union shall be deemed denied.

6
7

Date: 2/19/2014

8

____________________________________
JUDGE, United States District Court,
Northern District of California

9
10
11
12
13
14

DISTRIBUTION TO:
Mark F. Anderson, Esq.
[e-mail]
Brian C. Frontino, Esq.
[e-mail]
Catherine Huang, Esq.
[e-mail]

Julia B. Strickland, Esq.
[e-mail]
Monica Katz-Lapides, Esq.
[e-mail]
Scott E. Brady, Esq.
[e-mail]

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AS TO PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [DOC NO. 23] –
4:13-CV-05349-SBA
Page 3 of 3