Steiner et al v. OneWest Bank F.S.B. et al

Filing 39

ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong Granting 38 Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice Between Plaintiffs and Defendant Trans Union, LLC Only (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Scott E. Brady, Esq. (IN #30534-49) (admitted Pro Hac Vice) Schuckit & Associates, P.C. 4545 Northwestern Drive Zionsville, IN 46077 Telephone: 317-363-2400 Fax: 317-363-2257 E-Mail: sbrady@schuckitlaw.com 5 Lead Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC 6 10 Monica Katz-Lapides, Esq. (CSB #267231) Tate &th Associates 1321 8 Street, Suite 4 Berkeley, CA 94710 Telephone: 510-525-5100 Fax: 510-525-5130 E-Mail: mkl@tateandassociates-law.com 11 Local Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC 7 8 9 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 OAKLAND DIVISION 16 17 18 19 20 21 RICHARD A. STEINER and CAROLE J. STEINER, Plaintiffs, vs. ONEWEST BANK, FSB and TRANS UNION, LLC, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 4:13-cv-05349-SBA STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY 22 23 Plaintiffs Richard A. Steiner and Carole J. Steiner, by counsel, and Defendant Trans 24 Union, LLC (“Trans Union”), by counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that all matters herein 25 between them have been compromised and settled, and that Plaintiffs’ cause against Trans 26 Union only should be dismissed, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and 27 attorneys’ fees. 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 4:13-CV-05349-SBA Page 1 of 3 Respectfully submitted, 1 2 3 Date: March 11, 2014 4 5 6 7 8 s/ Mark F. Anderson (with consent) Mark F. Anderson, Esq. Anderson, Ogilvie & Brewer, LLP 235 Montgomery Street, Suite 914 San Francisco, CO 94104 Telephone: 415-651-1951 Fax: 415-956-3233 E-Mail: mark@aoblawyers.com Counsel for Richard A. Steiner and Carole J. Steiner 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Date: March 11, 2014 s/ Scott E. Brady Scott E. Brady, Esq. (IN #30534-49) (admitted Pro Hac Vice) Schuckit & Associates, P.C. 4545 Northwestern Drive Zionsville, IN 46077 Telephone: 317-363-2400 Fax: 317-363-2257 E-Mail: sbrady@schuckitlaw.com Lead Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC 17 18 19 20 21 22 Monica Katz-Lapides, Esq. (CSB #267231) Tate &th Associates 1321 8 Street, Suite 4 Berkeley, CA 94710 Telephone: 510-525-5100 Fax: 510-525-5130 E-Mail: mkl@tateandassociates-law.com Local Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC 23 24 25 Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the Signatories. 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 4:13-CV-05349-SBA Page 2 of 3 1 ORDER 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that all claims of Plaintiffs 3 Richard A. Steiner and Carole J. Steiner against Defendant Trans Union, LLC are dismissed, 4 with prejudice. Plaintiffs Richard A. Steiner and Carole J. Steiner and Defendant Trans Union, 5 LLC shall each bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees. 6 7 3/12/2014 Date: ________________________ 8 ____________________________________ JUDGE, United States District Court, Northern District of California 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 DISTRIBUTION TO: Mark F. Anderson, Esq. mark@aoblawyers.com Scott E. Brady, Esq. sbrady@schuckitlaw.com Brian C. Frontino, Esq. bfrontino@stroock.com Julia B. Strickland, Esq. jstrickland@strook.com Ani Azadian, Esq. aazadian@stroock.com Monica Katz-Lapides, Esq. mkl@tateandassociates-law.com Catherine Huang, Esq. chuang@stroock.com 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC ONLY – 4:13-CV-05349-SBA Page 3 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?