Rodgers v. Claim Jumper Restaurant, LLC et al

Filing 26

ORDER CONTINUING COMPLIANCE HEARING. ***Deadlines terminated. 22 Order on Motion to Strike, setting compliance hearing. Compliance Hearing set for 5/16/2014 is CONTINUED to Friday, 6/20/2014 09:01 AM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 5/15/2014. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 JOHN RODGERS, an individual, 7 8 9 10 Plaintiff, Case No.: 13-CV-5496 YGR ORDER CONTINUING COMPLIANCE HEARING vs. CLAIM JUMPER RESTAURANT, LLC, et al., Defendants. 11 TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: Northern District of California United States District Court 12 In light of the representations made by the parties concerning the status of this litigation and 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 the parties’ scheduled June 5, 2014 joint site inspection, the compliance hearing regarding the parties’ compliance with General Order 56 scheduled for Friday, May 16, 2014 shall be continued to Friday, June 20, 2014 on the Court’s 9:01 a.m. calendar, in the Federal Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, Courtroom 1. Five (5) business days prior to the date of the compliance hearing, the parties shall file either: (a) a statement attesting to their compliance with General Order 56 and the completion of the joint site 20 inspection, or (b) a one-page JOINT STATEMENT setting forth an explanation for their failure to 21 comply. If compliance is complete, the parties need not appear and the compliance hearing will be 22 taken off calendar. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Telephonic appearances will be allowed if the parties have submitted a joint statement in a timely fashion. Failure to do so may result in sanctions. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 15, 2014 ____________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?