Lawanda Anderson-v-City and County of San Francisco

Filing 75

NOTICE of Settlement Conference and Settlement Conference Order by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte: A Settlement Conference is set for 12/16/2015 at 9:15 AM in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, San Francisco. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 LAWANDA ANDERSON, Case No. 4:13-cv-05555 DMR (EDL) Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER 12 TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: 13 The above matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte for settlement 14 purposes. You are hereby notified that a settlement conference is scheduled for December 16, 15 2015, at 9:15 a.m., at the U.S. District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 15th floor, Courtroom E, 16 San Francisco, CA 94102. 17 If the parties and counsel are not available on that date, or if they believe that a settlement 18 conference would be more productive at a different time, counsel must confer on new potential 19 date(s) and then contact courtroom deputy Stephen Ybarra immediately at 415-522-3694. The 20 parties should be mindful of any time limits set by the district court. 21 It is the responsibility of counsel to ensure that whatever discovery is needed for all sides 22 to evaluate the case for settlement purposes is completed by the date of the settlement conference. 23 Counsel shall cooperate in providing discovery informally and expeditiously. 24 A. Meet and Confer Requirement and Option to Request Pre-Settlement Conference 25 Call with Judge Laporte 26 Before the settlement conference and prior to the preparation of their settlement conference 27 documents, counsel for the parties shall endeavor to meet and confer (in person or by phone) to 28 discuss matters pertinent to improving the prospects that the settlement negotiations will be 1 productive. To the extent the meet and confer is possible, counsel may address any subjects they 2 feel are appropriate, but they must discuss the following: 1. Who will attend the conference on behalf of each party, including counsel and 3 4 identification of the person(s) with full authority to make the final decision as to whether 5 any settlement offer is made, accepted, or rejected (e.g., the party, and another person(s) if 6 full authority does not rest with the party). 2. Which persons or entities must approve a proposed settlement agreement before it can be 7 executed, as well as the nature and duration of any such approval process. 8 3. Whether insurance is available to cover all or part of the claimed losses or to fund all or 9 part of any party's defense; whether tenders have been made to any insurance companies; 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 and if insurance is available, the name of and position held by each claims representative 12 who will be attending the settlement conference. 4. Whether there are particular documents or other tangible things that should be brought to 13 14 the conference (e.g., to educate the settlement judge or to support or explain significant 15 contentions). 5. Any unusual issues or factors that could come into play in the settlement negotiations or 16 17 any especially sensitive matters that other counsel or the Court should be alerted to before 18 the conference. 6. Whether a pre-settlement conference call with the attorneys and the settlement judge would 19 20 help make the process more productive (e.g., by ensuring that the appropriate client 21 representatives attend.) Counsel may arrange a pre-settlement conference call with 22 Judge Laporte by calling Stephen Ybarra at 415-522-3694. 23 24 B. Exchange of Current Settlement Demand and Response If there is no current settlement demand, Plaintiff shall (to the extent possible) serve a 25 demand on Defendant in writing prior to the settlement conference, outlining its theories for 26 recovery, the supporting facts, and damages. Plaintiff must include its demand in its exchanged 27 settlement conference statement. Defendant must include its response to the demand in its 28 exchanged settlement conference statement. 2 1 2 3 C. Lodged Settlement Conference Documents To the extent possible, each party shall endeavor to provide some or all of the following by 12:00 p.m. on December 15, 2015: 4 (1) an Exchanged Settlement Conference Statement; and 5 (2) a Confidential Settlement Letter. 6 The parties shall deliver the Settlement Conference Documents directly to Magistrate Judge 7 Laporte's chambers on the 15th floor. 8 1. Exchanged Settlement Conference Statements 9 Counsel shall serve a copy of the Settlement Conference Statement on all parties. Furthermore, counsel are strongly encouraged prior to the settlement conference to share with 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 their clients the contents of the Settlement Conference Statement(s) received from opposing 12 counsel. 13 The Settlement Conference Statement shall not exceed ten (10) pages of text. Parties are 14 encouraged to include as exhibits any key documents and deposition excerpts, with highlighting as 15 appropriate. The Settlement Conference Statement shall include the following: 16 a. A brief statement of the facts of the case. 17 b. A brief statement of the principal claims and defenses. 18 c. A description of the key factual and legal issues that are in dispute and a plain 19 and concise statement of the specific evidence relevant to their determination. 20 Portions of any exhibits and transcripts relied upon by the parties shall be 21 referenced and highlighted. 22 23 d. A summary of the proceedings to date and a description of any pending motions. 24 e. The bases for any damages calculations and a description of any nonmonetary 25 relief sought or non-monetary components of settlement offers or demands. 26 f. The history and current status of settlement discussions, and the party's current 27 28 demand/offer of settlement to the opposing party(ies). g. For each party, a list of the names, titles, and positions of all persons who will 3 be attending the conference. 1 h. Where the party is a governmental entity, a description of which persons or 2 3 entities must approve a proposed settlement agreement before it can be execute, 4 as well as the nature and duration of that approval process. 5 2. Confidential Settlement Letters 6 The Confidential Settlement Letter shall not be served upon other parties. 7 The Confidential Settlement Letter shall not exceed five (5) pages of text and shall include 8 the following: a. Separately for each principal claim and defense, a candid and forthright 10 evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses and likelihood that the party 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 9 submitting the Confidential Letter will prevail. Citations to any key legal 12 authorities relied upon by the parties as part of this evaluation shall be 13 provided. 14 b. An estimate of the out-of-pocket expenses, attorneys' fees, and time: (a) spent 15 to date and (b) to be expended for further discovery, pretrial, and trial. If 16 plaintiff seeks attorneys' fees and costs, plaintiff's counsel shall be prepared at 17 the conference to provide sufficient information to enable the fee claim to be 18 evaluated for purposes of settlement. 19 c. A description of the principal obstacles (factual, legal, or other) to reaching a 20 settlement agreement, and the reason the parties' assessments of the settlement 21 value of the case differ. 22 d. A realistic settlement figure and/or terms (including and non-monetary terms) 23 that, given all the circumstances, the party submitting the Confidential Letter 24 would consider seriously. 25 e. Where the party is insured or is a governmental entity, any foreseeable barriers 26 to insurance coverage or approval of a proposed settlement, or special concerns 27 that the insurer or governmental entity might want addressed. 28 f. A brief discussion of any of the subjects identified in Section A of this Order 4 that might be significant in the settlement dynamic. 1 2 D. Mandatory Personal Attendance Lead trial counsel shall appear at the settlement conference with the parties and with the 3 4 person(s) having full authority to make the final decision as to whether any settlement offer is 5 made, accepted, or rejected (if full authority does not rest with the party). A person who needs to 6 call another person not present before making, accepting, or rejecting any settlement offer does not 7 have such full authority. If a party is a governmental entity, its governing body shall designate 8 one of its members or a senior executive to appear at the settlement conference with authority to 9 participate in the settlement conference and, if a tentative settlement agreement is reached, to recommend the agreement to the governmental entity for its approval. An insured party shall 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 appear with a representative of the carrier with full authority to negotiate up to the limits of 12 coverage. Personal attendance is mandatory and will rarely be excused by the Court, and only upon 13 14 written authorization from the Court. To seek to excuse a party from personally attending a 15 settlement conference, counsel for the party shall meet and confer with counsel for all other parties 16 to determine if there are any objections to the moving party's absence. Counsel must then lodge a 17 letter with the Court, with copies to all parties, seeking to excuse the party's participation. The 18 letter shall recite the compelling reasons for seeking the party's absence, as well as whether the 19 other parties agree or object to the request and the reasons for any objection. The application to 20 excuse a party must be lodged no later than the lodging of the Settlement Conference Documents. 21 If the Court permits attendance by telephone, the person who is excused from personally 22 appearing must be available to participate by telephone throughout the entire conference. 23 E. 24 Duration and Content of Settlement Conference It is not unusual for settlement conferences to last three (3) or more hours, or at times all 25 day. Parties and their representatives should be prepared to devote the entire day to the conference 26 if necessary. Parties are encouraged to participate in the settlement conference and frankly discuss 27 their case. Statements they make during the conference will not be admissible in the event the 28 case does not settle. See ADR L.R. 7-5. The parties and their representatives should be prepared 5 1 to discuss such issues as their settlement objectives; and impediments to settlement that they 2 perceive; whether they have enough information to discuss settlement and if not, what additional 3 information is needed; and the possibility of a creative resolution of the dispute. 4 F. 5 Continuances Any request to continue the settlement conference shall be submitted in writing as soon as 6 possible after consultation with the opposing party. The request must demonstrate a 7 compelling reason for a continuance, and state whether the opposing party(ies) agree or oppose 8 the request. Any party who objects to the continuance should submit a written response within 2 9 business days. Courtesy copies of any electronically filed documents must be delivered to 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 chambers as provided in Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7). The parties shall notify Magistrate Judge Laporte's Courtroom Deputy, Stephen Ybarra, immediately at 415-522-3694 if this case settles prior to the date set for settlement conference. Any failure to comply with the requirements of this Order may subject the parties and/or counsel to sanctions. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 14, 2015 ______________________________________ ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?