Lawanda Anderson-v-City and County of San Francisco

Filing 80

ORDER Vacating and Resetting Pretrial and Trial Deadlines; Taking Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint Under Submission; Denying Plaintiff's Motion to Shorten Time, Motions terminated: 78 MOTION to Shorten Time filed by Lawanda Anderson. Signed by Judge Donna M. Ryu on 1/5/2016. (dmrlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 LAWANDA ANDERSON, Case No. 13-cv-05555-DMR Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ORDER VACATING AND RESETTING PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DEADLINES; TAKING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT UNDER SUBMISSION WITHOUT ORAL ARGUMENT; DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME Re: Dkt. Nos. 77, 78 TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: The current pretrial and trial deadlines are hereby vacated. Jury trial is continued to April 25, 2016. The pretrial conference shall be held on April 13, 2016 at 3:00 p.m. Opening pretrial submissions are now due on March 25, 2016. The court will issue an amended trial order which will contain the remaining pretrial deadlines. All other deadlines, including fact discovery, expert discovery and dispositive motions, remain unchanged. The court has received Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a second amended complaint 21 [Docket No. 77], and finds that the matter is appropriate for resolution without oral argument 22 pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). Accordingly, the January 28, 2016 hearing on the motion is 23 hereby VACATED. Plaintiff's administrative motion to shorten time [Docket No. 78] is therefore 24 denied as moot. The court will issue a written order on the motion. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 5, 2016 ______________________________________ Donna M. Ryu United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?