Lawanda Anderson-v-City and County of San Francisco
Filing
80
ORDER Vacating and Resetting Pretrial and Trial Deadlines; Taking Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint Under Submission; Denying Plaintiff's Motion to Shorten Time, Motions terminated: 78 MOTION to Shorten Time filed by Lawanda Anderson. Signed by Judge Donna M. Ryu on 1/5/2016. (dmrlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
LAWANDA ANDERSON,
Case No. 13-cv-05555-DMR
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO,
Defendant.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
ORDER VACATING AND RESETTING
PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DEADLINES;
TAKING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT UNDER
SUBMISSION WITHOUT ORAL
ARGUMENT; DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME
Re: Dkt. Nos. 77, 78
TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:
The current pretrial and trial deadlines are hereby vacated. Jury trial is continued to April
25, 2016. The pretrial conference shall be held on April 13, 2016 at 3:00 p.m. Opening pretrial
submissions are now due on March 25, 2016. The court will issue an amended trial order which
will contain the remaining pretrial deadlines.
All other deadlines, including fact discovery, expert discovery and dispositive motions,
remain unchanged.
The court has received Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a second amended complaint
21
[Docket No. 77], and finds that the matter is appropriate for resolution without oral argument
22
pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). Accordingly, the January 28, 2016 hearing on the motion is
23
hereby VACATED. Plaintiff's administrative motion to shorten time [Docket No. 78] is therefore
24
denied as moot. The court will issue a written order on the motion.
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 5, 2016
______________________________________
Donna M. Ryu
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?