Allstate Insurance Company v. Segura et al
TENTATIVE RULING AND REQUEST FOR FURTHER STATEMENT. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 7/22/14. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2014)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LUIS AND YOLANDA SEGURA,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No.: 13-CV-5594 YGR
Case No.: 14-CV-1589 YGR
Case No.: 14-CV-1687 YGR
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.,
TENTATIVE RULING AND REQUEST FOR
AND RELATED CASES.
Now before the Court area total of four motions filed in three related insurance coverage
cases. In Segura v. Allstate, Case No. 14-1687, there are two motions: (1) Plaintiffs Yolanda and
Luis Segura’s Motion to Remand (Dkt. No. 15); (2) Defendant Allstate’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt.
No. 14). In Allstate v. Segura, Case No. 13-5594, Defendants Seguras have filed a Motion to
Dismiss (Dkt. No. 31) to which Defendants Bac, et al., have joined (Dkt. No. 3). In Bac v. Allstate,
Case No. 14-1589, Plaintiffs Bac, et al., have filed a Motion to Remand (Dkt. No. 12).
Having carefully considered the papers submitted and the pleadings in these actions, the
Court is inclined to grant the Seguras’ Motion to Remand. By Friday, July 25, the parties may, if
they choose, file a response not to exceed four pages explaining how an order remanding the
Segura v. Allstate case will bear on the other outstanding motions. The parties shall be prepared to
discuss the same at oral argument on July 29, 2014.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: July 22, 2014
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?