Allstate Insurance Company v. Segura et al
Filing
65
ORDER VACATING COMPLIANCE HEARING; SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING. Compliance Hearing set for 2/13/2015 is CONTINUED to Friday, 8/14/2015 09:01 AM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 2/11/15. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY,
Case No. 13-cv-05594-YGR
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
LUIS SEGURA, ET AL.,
ORDER VACATING COMPLIANCE HEARING;
SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
Having received the parties’ statement concerning the status of the stay in this action, the
Court hereby VACATES the compliance hearing set for February 13, 2015.
A compliance hearing regarding the status of the state court litigation and the factors
16
supporting the stay in this action shall be held on Friday, August 14, 2015 on the Court’s 9:01
17
a.m. calendar, in the Federal Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, Courtroom 1.
18
Five (5) business days prior to the date of the compliance hearing, the parties shall file
19
either: (a) statement apprising the Court of the status of the state court litigation and the factors
20
supporting the stay in this action; or (b) a one-page JOINT STATEMENT setting forth an explanation
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
for their failure to comply. If compliance is complete, the parties need not appear and the
compliance hearing will be taken off calendar.
Telephonic appearances will be allowed if the parties have submitted a joint statement in a
timely fashion. Failure to do so may result in sanctions
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 11, 2015
______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?