Lofton v. Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC

Filing 68

ORDER FOLLOWING NOVEMBER 20, 2014 DISCOVERY CONFERENCE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 11/21/2014. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2014)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

JOHN LOFTON,

Case No. 13-cv-05665-YGR (JSC)

Plaintiff,
8
v.

ORDER FOLLOWING NOVEMBER 20,
2014 DISCOVERY CONFERENCE

9
10

VERIZON WIRELESS (VAW) LLC,
Defendant.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

Discovery and related disputes in this matter has been referred to the undersigned

13

magistrate judge. (Dkts. No. 39, 65.) For the reasons stated at the hearing held on November 20,

14

2014, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1.

15

Defendant shall produce all remaining Collecto call logs by November 26, 2014.

16

Defendant shall submit a declaration by December 2, 2014, indicating whether production of

17

Collecto call logs is complete, and whether the documents produced include information about

18

disposition, dialer ID, and dialing mode.
2.

20
21

A further telephone status conference shall be held on December 11, 2014 at 9:00

3.

19

With respect to Plaintiff’s Motion to Continue the Court’s December 16, 2014

a.m.

22

Deadline to Move for Class Certification (Dkt. No. 57), the current deadline is VACATED. The

23

Court will discuss with the parties a new schedule for briefing class certification during the

24

December 11 telephone status conference.

25

4.

The Motion to Quash Plaintiff’s Subpoena to Produce Documents (Dkt. No. 63)

26

filed by Non-party Valentine & Kebartas, Inc. (“V&K”) is DENIED without prejudice to refiling.

27

It does not appear from V&K’s motion that the parties have sufficiently met and conferred

28

regarding V&K’s objections to the subpoenas as required by this Court’s Standing Orders. The

1

Court accordingly orders V&K and Plaintiff to meet and confer regarding the dispute. If any

2

dispute remains following the meet-and-confer, the parties shall file a joint discovery letter in

3

accordance with this Court’s Standing Order.

4

5.

Plaintiff’s request for spoliation sanctions set forth in the parties’ Letter Brief

5

Regarding Sanctions for Obstruction of Class Discovery (Dkt. No. 61) is DENIED without

6

prejudice to refiling in the form of a formally noticed motion.

7

This Order disposes of Docket Nos. 57, 61, and 63.

8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Dated: November 21, 2014
______________________________________
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
United States Magistrate Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2