Levi Strauss & Co. v. 509, Inc.
Filing
24
ORDER granting voluntary dismissal. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 8/29/2014. (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2014)
Case4:13-cv-05670-PJH Document23 Filed08/29/14 Page1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
GREGORY S. GILCHRIST (State Bar No. 111536)
GIA L. CINCONE (State Bar No. 141668)
RYAN BRICKER (State Bar No. 269100)
Two Embarcadero Center, 8th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 576-0200
Facsimile: (415) 576-0300
Email: ggilchrist@kilpatricktownsend.com, gcincone@kilpatricktownsend.com,
rbricker@kilpatricktownsend.com
6
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LEVI STRAUSS & CO.
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LEVI STRAUSS & CO.,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
Case No. CV 13-05670 PJH
PLAINTIFF LEVI STRAUSS & CO.’S
REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ITS
CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT
v.
509, INC.,
Defendant.
16
17
18
Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2), Plaintiff Levi Strauss & Co. voluntarily seeks to dismiss
19
with prejudice its claims in this Action in accordance with the terms of a settlement agreement
20
between the parties.
21
DATED: August 29, 2014
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
22
23
By: /s/ Ryan Bricker
24
25
26
GREGORY S. GILCHRIST
GIA L. CINCONE
RYAN BRICKER
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LEVI STRAUSS & CO.
27
28
REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
CASE NO. 13-05670 PJH
-1-
R NIA
ilton
Ham
hyllis J.
___________________________________________
Judge P
Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton
ER
C
N
United States District Judge
F
DI
TO
LI
A
H
3
ERED
FO
Dated:
UNIT
ED
2
O ORD
IT IS S
RT
IT IS SO ORDERED.
RIC
TC
NO
1
SD
TE
TA
RT
U
O
S
Case4:13-cv-05670-PJH Document23 Filed08/29/14 Page2 of 2
IST
S T RIC
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
CASE NO. 13-05670 PJH
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?