Savelson et al v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al
Filing
25
ORDER DENYING 18 JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMITATIONS. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 2/25/2014. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2014)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
OAKLAND DIVISION
5
6 MELVIN SALVERSON, an individual, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
7
8
vs.
C 13-5816 SBA
Case No: C 13-4406 SBA
ORDER DENYING JOINT
ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
ENLARGE PAGE LIMITATIONS
9 JP MORGAN CHASE & CO; et al.,
Dkt. 18
10
Defendants.
11
12
13
The parties have filed a joint administrative motion for leave to file motions papers
14
that are twenty (20) pages in excess of the limits imposed by the Court’s Standing Orders.
15
The Court finds that the parties have failed to demonstrate good cause for their request.
16
Moreover, the parties should be aware that arguments presented in a direct and concise
17
manner are generally more effective that those that are not. See Fleming v. County of
18
Kane, State of Ill., 855 F.2d 496, 497 (7th Cir. 1988) (“Overly long briefs, however, may
19
actually hurt a party’s case, making it far more likely that meritorious arguments will be
20
lost amid the mass of detail.”); Weilert v. Health Midwest Development Group, 95 F.
21
Supp.2d 1190, 1192 (D. Kan. 2000) (“Judicial economy and concise argument are purposes
22
of the page limit.”). Accordingly, the parties’ administrative motion to enlarge the Court’s
23
page limits is DENIED.
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 2/25/14
______________________________
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
Senior United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?