Savelson et al v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al

Filing 25

ORDER DENYING 18 JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMITATIONS. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 2/25/2014. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 OAKLAND DIVISION 5 6 MELVIN SALVERSON, an individual, et al., Plaintiffs, 7 8 vs. C 13-5816 SBA Case No: C 13-4406 SBA ORDER DENYING JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMITATIONS 9 JP MORGAN CHASE & CO; et al., Dkt. 18 10 Defendants. 11 12 13 The parties have filed a joint administrative motion for leave to file motions papers 14 that are twenty (20) pages in excess of the limits imposed by the Court’s Standing Orders. 15 The Court finds that the parties have failed to demonstrate good cause for their request. 16 Moreover, the parties should be aware that arguments presented in a direct and concise 17 manner are generally more effective that those that are not. See Fleming v. County of 18 Kane, State of Ill., 855 F.2d 496, 497 (7th Cir. 1988) (“Overly long briefs, however, may 19 actually hurt a party’s case, making it far more likely that meritorious arguments will be 20 lost amid the mass of detail.”); Weilert v. Health Midwest Development Group, 95 F. 21 Supp.2d 1190, 1192 (D. Kan. 2000) (“Judicial economy and concise argument are purposes 22 of the page limit.”). Accordingly, the parties’ administrative motion to enlarge the Court’s 23 page limits is DENIED. 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 2/25/14 ______________________________ SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG Senior United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?