Riggs v. Grounds et al

Filing 67

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton denying 56 Motion to Compel. (CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ATTACHED) (napS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2015) Modified on 9/18/2015 (napS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ISAAC RIGGS, Case No. 13-cv-05864-PJH Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL 9 10 R.T.C. GROUNDS, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 56 Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds with a civil rights action alleging that defendant 14 Cahlander utilized excessive force against him. Plaintiff has filed a motion to compel five 15 document requests. Defendant has opposed the motion. 16 A party may bring a motion to compel discovery when another party has failed to 17 respond or respond adequately to a discovery request. Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(3). A party 18 may “obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any party’s 19 claim or defense” but “for good cause, the court may order discovery of any matter 20 relevant to the subject matter involved in the action.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b). As the 21 moving party, plaintiff bears the burden of informing the court which discovery requests 22 are the subject of his motion to compel and for each disputed response, why defendants’ 23 objections are not justified or why the response provided is deficient. 24 Plaintiff’s motion simply lists the five requests but fails to address defendant’s 25 responses to the requests and why the responses were deficient. Defendant’s opposition 26 includes the responses and various correspondences between the parties and copies of 27 the documents that were provided. Plaintiff has not filed a reply to the opposition. 28 1 Plaintiff seeks the following discovery: 2 1. Policy for shower procedures 3 2. Policy for razor exchange. 4 3. Unit log for daily activities for February 7, 2012. 5 4. Rules violation report issued to plaintiff regarding the incident. 6 5. Personal records for all complaints for use of force or misconduct for the 7 8 9 past seven years. Defendant states that discovery for the first four requests were provided. Plaintiff does not dispute this assertion and a review of defendant’s motion demonstrates the discovery was provided. Defendant has also provided discovery regarding complaints of 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 use of force against Cahlander. To the extent plaintiff seeks private information from 12 defendant’s personal records he has failed to specifically identify what he seeks and why 13 it is required. Because defendant has provided the discovery requested, the motion to 14 compel (Docket No. 56) is DENIED. 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 Dated: September 18, 2015 17 ________________________ PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 \\CANDOAK\Data\Users\PJHALL\_psp\2013\2013_05864_Riggs_v_Grounds_(PSP)\13-cv-05864-PJH-_compel.docx 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 ISAAC RIGGS, Case No. 13-cv-05864-PJH Plaintiff, 6 v. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 7 8 R.T.C. GROUNDS, et al., Defendants. 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on September 18, 2015, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 16 17 18 Isaac Riggs ID: E-26630 Corcoran State Prison 3A Yard 3 building cell 108 P.O. Box 3461 Corcoran, CA 93212 19 20 21 Dated: September 18, 2015 22 23 Clerk, United States District Court 24 25 26 By:________________________ Nichole Peric, Deputy Clerk to the Honorable PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?