Riggs v. Grounds et al
Filing
67
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton denying 56 Motion to Compel. (CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ATTACHED) (napS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2015) Modified on 9/18/2015 (napS, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
ISAAC RIGGS,
Case No. 13-cv-05864-PJH
Plaintiff,
8
v.
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
COMPEL
9
10
R.T.C. GROUNDS, et al.,
Re: Dkt. No. 56
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds with a civil rights action alleging that defendant
14
Cahlander utilized excessive force against him. Plaintiff has filed a motion to compel five
15
document requests. Defendant has opposed the motion.
16
A party may bring a motion to compel discovery when another party has failed to
17
respond or respond adequately to a discovery request. Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(3). A party
18
may “obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any party’s
19
claim or defense” but “for good cause, the court may order discovery of any matter
20
relevant to the subject matter involved in the action.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b). As the
21
moving party, plaintiff bears the burden of informing the court which discovery requests
22
are the subject of his motion to compel and for each disputed response, why defendants’
23
objections are not justified or why the response provided is deficient.
24
Plaintiff’s motion simply lists the five requests but fails to address defendant’s
25
responses to the requests and why the responses were deficient. Defendant’s opposition
26
includes the responses and various correspondences between the parties and copies of
27
the documents that were provided. Plaintiff has not filed a reply to the opposition.
28
1
Plaintiff seeks the following discovery:
2
1. Policy for shower procedures
3
2. Policy for razor exchange.
4
3. Unit log for daily activities for February 7, 2012.
5
4. Rules violation report issued to plaintiff regarding the incident.
6
5. Personal records for all complaints for use of force or misconduct for the
7
8
9
past seven years.
Defendant states that discovery for the first four requests were provided. Plaintiff
does not dispute this assertion and a review of defendant’s motion demonstrates the
discovery was provided. Defendant has also provided discovery regarding complaints of
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
use of force against Cahlander. To the extent plaintiff seeks private information from
12
defendant’s personal records he has failed to specifically identify what he seeks and why
13
it is required. Because defendant has provided the discovery requested, the motion to
14
compel (Docket No. 56) is DENIED.
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
Dated: September 18, 2015
17
________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
18
19
20
21
22
\\CANDOAK\Data\Users\PJHALL\_psp\2013\2013_05864_Riggs_v_Grounds_(PSP)\13-cv-05864-PJH-_compel.docx
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
ISAAC RIGGS,
Case No. 13-cv-05864-PJH
Plaintiff,
6
v.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
7
8
R.T.C. GROUNDS, et al.,
Defendants.
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.
That on September 18, 2015, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by
placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery
receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
16
17
18
Isaac Riggs ID: E-26630
Corcoran State Prison 3A Yard 3 building cell 108
P.O. Box 3461
Corcoran, CA 93212
19
20
21
Dated: September 18, 2015
22
23
Clerk, United States District Court
24
25
26
By:________________________
Nichole Peric, Deputy Clerk to the
Honorable PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?