Tobii Technology AB v. The Eye Tribe APS
Filing
108
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 9/30/16. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2016)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
TOBII TECHNOLOGY AB,
5
6
7
Plaintiff,
Case No. 4:13-CV-05877-SBA
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE
v.
THE EYE TRIBE APS,
8
Defendant.
9
10
On this day, Plaintiff Tobii Technology AB (“Tobii”) and Defendant and Counter-
11
Plaintiff The Eye Tribe APS (“TET”) announced to the Court that they have resolved Tobii’s
12
claims for relief against TET asserted in the case and TET’s counterclaims for relief against Tobii
13
asserted in this case. Tobii and TET have therefore requested that the Court dismiss Tobii’s
14
claims for relief against TET with prejudice and TET’s counterclaims for relief against Tobii with
15
prejudice, and with all attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses taxed against the party incurring same.
16
The Court, having considered this request, is of the opinion that their request for dismissal should
17
be granted.
18
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Tobii’s claims for relief against TET are dismissed
19
with prejudice and TET’s counterclaims for relief against Tobii are dismissed with prejudice. IT
20
IS FURTHER ORDERED that all attorneys’ fees, costs of court and expenses shall be borne by
21
each party incurring the same.
22
23
24
25
30
Dated: September ___, 2016
By:
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE
[CASE NO. 4:13-CV-05877]
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?