Tobii Technology AB v. The Eye Tribe APS
Filing
85
ORDER CONTINUING CLAIMS CONSTRUCTION HEARING re 84 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Claims Construction Hearing filed by Tobii Technology AB, The Eye Tribe APS. Claims Construction Hearing set for 11/19/2015 10:00 AM. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 9/10/15. (jebS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
VEDDER PRICE (CA), LLP
Heather M. Sager, Bar No. 186566
hsager@vedderprice.com
275 Battery Street, Suite 2464
San Francisco, California 94111
T: +1 (415) 749 9500
F: +1 (415) 749 9502
VEDDER PRICE P.C.
Mark A. Dalla Valle, Bar No. 143414
mdallavalle@vedderprice.com
Michael J. Waters (pro hac vice)
mwaters@vedderprice.com
222 North LaSalle Street
Chicago, Illinois 60601
T: +1 (312) 609 7500
F: +1 (312) 609 5005
Attorneys for Defendant
THE EYE TRIBE APS
11
12
13
14
KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP
Yonaton M. Rosenzweig, Bar No. 248137
yoni.rosenzweig@kattenlaw.com
2029 Century Park East, Suite 2600
Los Angeles, California 90067
T: +1 (310) 788-4400
F: +1 (310) 788-4471
15
16
Attorneys for Plaintiff
TOBII TECHNOLOGY AB
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
20
TOBII TECHNOLOGY AB,
Case No. 4:13-CV-05877
21
Plaintiff,
22
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
CLAIMS CONSTRUCTION HEARING
v.
23
THE EYE TRIBE APS,
24
Defendant.
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
CLAIMS CONSTRUCTION HEARING
[CASE NO. 4:13-CV-05877]
1
Based on the Parties’ Stipulation, the Court hereby orders that:
2
3
4
1. The Claims Construction Hearing is SCHEDULED for November 19, 2015 at
10:00 a.m.
5
6
7
2. Exhibits and visual aids for the Claims Construction Hearing shall be submitted
three (3) days before the rescheduled Claims Construction Hearing.
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11
Dated: September 10 2015
___,
By:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
CLAIMS CONSTRUCTION HEARING
[CASE NO. 4:13-CV-05877]
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?