Canatella v. Donovan et al

Filing 39

ORDER VACATING HEARING; DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY. The hearing set for May 13, 2014 is VACATED; Motions terminated: 37 MOTION to Appear by Telephone filed by Reverse Mortgage Solutions Inc is denied as moot. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 5/7/14. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/7/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 RICHARD A. CANATELLA, individually and as Trustee of the Canatella Family Trust, 14 Plaintiff, Case No.: 13-CV-5937 YGR ORDER VACATING HEARING; DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY 15 v. 16 17 18 19 20 SHAUN DONOVAN, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development; REVERSE MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS, INC., d/b/a Security One Lending, Defendants. 21 22 The Court has reviewed the papers submitted by the parties in connection with the pending 23 motions to dismiss the Amended Complaint of plaintiff Richard A. Canatella. (Dkt. Nos. 22, 25, 24 28.) Pursuant to that review, the Court has determined that the motions are appropriate for decision 25 without oral argument, as permitted by Civil Local Rule 7-1(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 78. See also Lake at Las Vegas Investors Group, Inc. v. Pacific Malibu Dev. Corp., 933 F.2d 724, 27 729 (9th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, the hearing set for May 13, 2014 is VACATED. The Court will 28 issue a written decision on the papers. 1 2 The pending motion of defendant Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc. to appear telephonically at the May 13 motion hearing is DENIED AS MOOT. 3 This Order terminates Docket No. 37. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 Date: May 7, 2014 _______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?