Canatella v. Donovan et al
Filing
47
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting in part and denying in part 46 Stipulated Request to Modify Briefing Schedule. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2015)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
RICHARD A. CANATELLA,
Case No. 13-cv-05937-YGR
Plaintiff,
7
ORDER RE STIPULATED REQUEST TO
MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE
v.
8
9
REVERSE MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS INC, ET
AL.,
10
Defendants.
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Re: Dkt. No. 46
Plaintiff filed his Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) on January 5, 2015. (Dkt. No. 45.)
12
Defendants’ responses thereto were due on January 19, 2015. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(3). On
13
January 20, 2015, the parties filed a joint stipulated request to modify the briefing schedule on
14
defendants’ contemplated motions to dismiss the SAC, extending defendants’ time to file motions
15
to dismiss by approximately one month and extending plaintiff’s opposition deadline by
16
approximately four months. (Dkt. No. 46.)
17
Pursuant to the request, and good cause shown, the Court hereby EXTENDS the deadline for
18
defendants to file their motions to dismiss the SAC to February 17, 2015. However, the Court
19
notes that this action was initiated on December 23, 2013. The parties have provided no
20
substantive reason for the substantial, four-month delay requested in connection with the filing of
21
plaintiff’s opposition brief(s). Therefore, the request is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
22
The request is GRANTED only as to the motion filing deadline noted above. The request is
23
24
25
26
27
28
otherwise DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
This Order terminates Docket No. 46.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 22, 2015
______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?