Canatella v. Donovan et al

Filing 47

ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting in part and denying in part 46 Stipulated Request to Modify Briefing Schedule. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 RICHARD A. CANATELLA, Case No. 13-cv-05937-YGR Plaintiff, 7 ORDER RE STIPULATED REQUEST TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE v. 8 9 REVERSE MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS INC, ET AL., 10 Defendants. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California Re: Dkt. No. 46 Plaintiff filed his Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) on January 5, 2015. (Dkt. No. 45.) 12 Defendants’ responses thereto were due on January 19, 2015. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(3). On 13 January 20, 2015, the parties filed a joint stipulated request to modify the briefing schedule on 14 defendants’ contemplated motions to dismiss the SAC, extending defendants’ time to file motions 15 to dismiss by approximately one month and extending plaintiff’s opposition deadline by 16 approximately four months. (Dkt. No. 46.) 17 Pursuant to the request, and good cause shown, the Court hereby EXTENDS the deadline for 18 defendants to file their motions to dismiss the SAC to February 17, 2015. However, the Court 19 notes that this action was initiated on December 23, 2013. The parties have provided no 20 substantive reason for the substantial, four-month delay requested in connection with the filing of 21 plaintiff’s opposition brief(s). Therefore, the request is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. 22 The request is GRANTED only as to the motion filing deadline noted above. The request is 23 24 25 26 27 28 otherwise DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. This Order terminates Docket No. 46. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 22, 2015 ______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?