Canatella v. Donovan et al
Filing
49
ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Set/Reset Deadlines as to Motion to Dismiss Filed by 2/17/15.Responses due by 6/2/2015. Replies due by 6/16/2015. Motion Hearing set for 6/30/2015 02:00 PM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Court DENIES the Motion to Enlarge Time as moot 48 . Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 1/28/15. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2015)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
RICHARD A. CANATELLA,
Case No. 13-cv-05937-YGR
Plaintiff,
5
v.
ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE
6
7
REVERSE MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS INC, ET
AL.,
8
Re: Dkt. No. 48
Defendants.
9
On January 20, 2015, the parties filed a joint stipulated request to modify the briefing
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
schedule on defendants’ contemplated motions to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint
12
(“SAC”). (Dkt. No. 46.) The Court granted the request in part, extending the deadline for
13
defendants to file their motions to dismiss the SAC to February 17, 2015, but otherwise denied the
14
15
16
17
request without prejudice as the parties failed to provide a substantive reason for the substantial
delay requested. (Dkt. No. 47.) On January 26, 2015, plaintiff Richard Canatella filed a Motion
to Enlarge Time, including a declaration detailing the reasons for the requested delay. (Dkt. No.
48.)
Having reviewed the papers submitted and good cause shown, the Court hereby SETS the
18
schedule as follows, pursuant to the stipulation (and DENIES the Motion to Enlarge Time as moot):
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
February 17, 2015:
Motion to Dismiss Filing Deadline
June 2, 2015:
Opposition Filing Deadline
June 16, 2015:
Reply Filing Deadline
June 30, 2015:
Hearing
This Order terminates Docket No. 48.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 28, 2015
______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?