Gehl et al v. Bloomin' Brands et al

Filing 14

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 12 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by Chris Armenta, Trent Broadstreet, Holly Gehl filed by OS Restaurant Services, LLC, Chris Armenta, T-Bird Nevada, LLC, Bloomin' Brands, Trent Broadstreet, Holly Gehl, T-Bird Restaurant Group, Inc., OSI Restaurant Partners, LLC, Case referred to Private ADR. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 3/4/14. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2014)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Holly Gehl, et al CASE NO. 4:13-cv-05961-KAW Plaintiff(s ), v. Bloomin' Brands, Inc. et al STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Defendant(s). ------------------------~/ Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) D D D (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form ofADR must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice ofNeedfor ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) ~ivate l{J Process: Private ADR (please identify process and provider) Private mediation; provider to be determined The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.) D [{] other requested deadline __ 18_0_d_a__,_y_s_______________________________ Dated: 3/3114 /S/ Eric Levinrad Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: 3/03/14 (s) Beth A. Schroeder Attorney for Defendant CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Holly Gehl, et al --------------------' Plaintiff(s), v. Bloomin' Brands, Inc. et al CASE NO. 4:13-cv-05961-KAW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS --------------------' s). Defendant( ------------------------~/ . Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) D B (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form ofADR must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) ~ivate l:LJ Process: Private ADR (please identify process and provider) Private mediation; provider to be determined The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.) 0 IZJ other requested deadline --=-=-:;...d :.Ly.s. ----------------------------18 0 =.::a ::. Dated:--------Dated: March 3, 2014 CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE Attorney for Plaintiff [PROPOSED] ORDER X D D The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 3/4/14 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATEJUDGE When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation." Rev. 12/ 11 Page 2 of2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?