Gehl et al v. Bloomin' Brands et al
Filing
60
ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore Granting 58 Stipulation TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2014)
1 DON SPRINGMEYER
dspringmeyer@wrslawyers.com
2 BRADLEY SCHRAGER (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
bschrager@wrslawyers.com
3 JUSTIN JONES (State Bar No. 218217)
jjones@wrslawyers.com
4 WOLF, RIFKIN, SHAPIRO, SCHULMAN & RABKIN, LLP
3556 E. Russell Road, Second Floor
5 Las Vegas, Nevada 89120
Telephone: (702) 341-5200
(702) 341-5300
6 Facsimile:
7 MATTHEW OSTER (State Bar No. 190541)
moster@wrslawyers.com
8 ERIC LEVINRAD (State Bar No. 169025)
elevinrad@wrslawyers.com
9 JOSHUA A. SHAPIRO (State Bar No. 229741)
jshapiro@wrslawyers.com
10 WOLF, RIFKIN, SHAPIRO, SCHULMAN & RABKIN, LLP
th
11400 West Olympic Boulevard, 9 Floor
11 Los Angeles, California 90064-1582
Telephone: (310) 478-4100
(310) 479-1422
12 Facsimile:
13 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION
17
18 HOLLY GEHL, et al others similarly
19 situated,
Plaintiffs,
20
21
22
23
Case No. 4:13-cv-05961-KAW
[Judge Kandis A. Westmore]
vs.
BLOOMIN’ BRANDS, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
JOINT STIPULATION TO
CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE;
ORDER
24
25
26
27
28
4:13-cv-05961-KAW
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
Plaintiffs and defendants T-Bird Restaurant Group, Inc. and T-Bird Nevada,
2 LLC (collectively, the “T-Bird Defendants”), through their attorneys of record,
3 hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
4
WHEREAS, this action is a putative class action brought by the named
5 plaintiffs on behalf of themselves and all current and former hourly, non-exempt
6 employees employed by the T-Bird Defendants at an “Outback Steakhouse”
7 Restaurant in California, at any time during the statutory time period;
8
WHEREAS, on August 25, 2014, this Court issued an Order requiring the
9 T-Bird Defendants to provide the contact information for all non-exempt employees
10 who have worked at any CALIFORNIA OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE
11 RESTAURANT from November 8, 2010, until the present time, to a third-party
12 administrator to be agreed-upon by the parties (“TPA”), and ordered that such
13 information be provided to the TPA by September 5, 2014;
14
WHEREAS, the Court ordered the TPA to send a mailing out to the non-
15 exempt employees identified by the T-Bird Defendants within ten days of receipt of
16 that information by the TPA;
17
WHEREAS, after taking into account the time deadlines set by the Court’s
18 August 25, 2014 Order, at the August 26, 2014 Case Management Conference the
19 Court set the following briefing and hearing schedule for a motion for class action
20 certification: Motion for Class Certification to be filed by January 5, 2015;
21 Opposition to be filed by February 17, 2015; Reply to be filed by March 3, 2015;
22 and Motion hearing set for March 19, 2015;
23
WHEREAS, the T-Bird Defendants provided the information required by the
24 Court’s August 25, 2014 order to the TPA on September 5, 2014, with the result that
25 the TPA was required to send out the mailing by September 15, 2014;
26
WHEREAS, there was a delay in the TPA sending out the required mailings,
27 which were not sent out until October 7, 2014 as a result;
28
1761546.2
4:13-cv-05961-KAW
-2JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
WHEREAS, in light of the delay, Plaintiffs and T-Bird Defendants have
2 agreed to continue the briefing schedule established at the August 26, 2014, case
3 management conference by 22 days (the length of the TPA’s delay), to provide
4 plaintiffs the same amount of time to prepare and file the motion for class
5 certification as was originally contemplated by the Court.
6
THEREFORE, IN LIGHT OF THE FOREGOING, PLAINTIFFS AND THE
7 T-BIRD DEFENDANTS HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE THAT:
8
Plaintiff’s motion for class certification shall be filed on or before January 27,
9 2015; the opposition to the motion shall be filed on or before March 11, 2015; the
10 reply in support of the motion shall be filed on or before March 25, 2015; and the
11 hearing date shall be continued to a date convenient for the Court on or after April
12 10, 2015.
13
14
IT IS SO STIPULATED
15 DATED: October 10, 2014
16
17
WOLF, RIFKIN, SHAPIRO,
SCHULMAN & RABKIN, LLP
By:
19
/s/ Eric Levinrad
ERIC LEVINRAD
Attorneys for Attorneys for Plaintiffs
20 DATED: October 10, 2014
LATHROP & GAGE, LLP
18
21
By:
/s/ Allison Wallin
BETH SCHROEDER
LAUREN KATUNICH
ALLISON WALLIN (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Attorneys for Defendants T-BIRD RESTAURANT
GROUP, INC. and T-BIRD NEVADA, LLC
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1761546.2
4:13-cv-05961-KAW
-3JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
ORDER
2
In light of the stipulation by and between Plaintiffs and the T-Bird
3 Defendants, and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
4
1.
The dates previously set for the briefing of Plaintiff’s motion for class
5 certification is extended as follows:
6
a.
Plaintiffs’ Motion for class certification shall be filed on or before
7 January 27, 2015;
8
b.
Defendants’ Opposition to motion for class certification to be filed on
9 or before March 11, 2015; and
10
c.
Plaintiffs’ reply in support of motion for class certification to be filed
11 on or before March 25, 2015.
12
2.
The hearing on Plaintiff’s motion for class certification is continued
13 from March 19, 2015 to May 7, 2015.
14
15 Dated: October 15, 2014
16
17
_____________________________________
18
HON. KANDIS A. WESTMORE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1761546.2
4:13-cv-05961-KAW
-4JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?