Gehl et al v. Bloomin' Brands et al

Filing 71

ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore granting 53 Motion to Withdraw as Counsel of Record for Shannon Spalding and for withdrawal of Shannon Spalding and Brittni Zacher as named plaintiffs. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 HOLLY GEHL, et al., Case No. 13-cv-05961-KAW Plaintiffs, 8 v. 9 10 T-BIRD RESTAURANT GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants. 11 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR PLAINTIFF SHANNON SPALDING AND FOR WITHDRAWAL OF SHANNON SPALDING AND BRITTNI ZACHER AS NAMED PLAINTIFFS United States District Court Northern District of California Dkt. No. 53 12 13 On September 26, 2014, Plaintiffs’ counsel filed a motion for leave to withdraw as counsel 14 of record for Plaintiff Shannon Spalding and to have Plaintiffs Spalding and Brittni Zacher 15 withdrawn as named plaintiffs. (Dkt. No. 53.) As to Plaintiff Spalding, Counsel claims that Ms. 16 Spalding has ceased communicating with counsel and failed to appear at her noticed deposition. 17 (Pls.’ Mot. at 2.) Plaintiffs’ counsel claims that Ms. Zacher has stated that she no longer wishes to 18 participate in the litigation, and her noticed deposition did not go forward. Counsel served copies 19 of the motion on Plaintiffs via email and U.S. Mail. (Dkt. No.54.) Defendants did not file an 20 opposition. 21 On October 15, 2014, the Court issued an order to show cause to Plaintiffs Spalding and 22 Zacher with a response date of October 31, 2014. (OSC, Dkt. No. 59.) Ms. Zacher was ordered to 23 submit a declaration under penalty of perjury confirming that she wanted to be withdrawn as a 24 named plaintiff. On October 29, 2014, Plaintiffs’ counsel filed a declaration with an email 25 attached confirming Ms. Zacher’s wish to no longer serve as a named plaintiff and that she did not 26 have access to a printer to print and sign a declaration. (Decl. of Eric Levinrad, Dkt. No. 68, Ex. 27 1.) Since the email was from Ms. Zacher’s email account, this is sufficient to confirm her wish to 28 withdraw as a named plaintiff. Ms. Zacher may, however, participate as a class member. 1 Ms. Spalding was ordered to show cause on or before October 31, 2014 to explain why the 2 law firm of Wolf, Rifkin, Shapiro, Schulman Rabkin, LLP should not be withdrawn as her counsel 3 in this case, and submit a declaration under penalty of perjury to either (1) confirm that she longer 4 wishes to be a party to this litigation or (2) explain why she did not appear at her deposition 5 despite wishing to remain a named plaintiff. Ms. Spalding was ordered to file her reply with the 6 court by mail. Plaintiffs’ counsel served the order to show cause on Ms. Spalding via email and 7 U.S. Mail. (Dkt. No. 61.) Plaintiff Spalding did not file a response as ordered. Thus, as to Ms. 8 Spalding, this motion may be granted as unopposed. 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 On November 6, 2014, the Court held a hearing at which neither Ms. Spalding nor Ms. Zacher appeared. Under Civil Local Rule 11-5(a), “[c]ounsel may not withdraw from an action until relieved 12 by order of Court after written notice has been given reasonably in advance to the client and to all 13 other parties who have appeared in the case.” 14 Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel for Shannon Spalding is 15 GRANTED as unopposed. Additionally, Plaintiffs’ motion for withdrawal of Shannon Spalding 16 and Brittni Zacher as named plaintiffs is also GRANTED. Since Ms. Spalding is no longer a party 17 to this action, any individual claims against Defendant Bloomin’ Brands, or any other remaining 18 defendants, are dismissed without prejudice. This dismissal does not bar Ms. Spalding from 19 participating as a class member. 20 Plaintiffs shall serve a copy of this order on both Shannon Spalding and Brittni Zacher. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 24 Dated: November 6, 2014 ______________________________________ KANDIS A. WESTMORE United States Magistrate Judge 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?