Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd et al

Filing 40

ORDER VACATING DATES AND SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING AS TO AFFINITY LABS OF TEXAS, LLC AND THE LG DEFENDANTS. Compliance Hearing is set for Friday, 5/9/2014 09:01 AM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 4/2/14. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2014) Modified on 4/2/2014 (fs, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 AFFINITY LABS OF TEXAS, LLC, 8 9 10 11 Plaintiff, Case No.: 13-MC-80209 YGR ORDER VACATING DATES AND SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., et al., Defendants. Northern District of California United States District Court 12 13 14 TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: The Court understands, based upon the representations of the parties, that the above-captioned 15 case has settled. (See Dkt. No. 39.) Accordingly, all pending motion, case management, and trial 16 dates are VACATED. A compliance hearing shall be held on the Court’s 9:01 a.m. calendar on 17 Friday, May 9, 2014, in Courtroom 1 of the United States Courthouse located at 1301 Clay Street in 18 Oakland, California. 19 At least five (5) business days prior to the date of the compliance hearing, the parties shall file 20 either (a) a Stipulation of Dismissal; or (b) a one-page JOINT STATEMENT setting forth an explanation 21 regarding the failure to comply. If compliance is complete, the parties need not appear and the 22 compliance hearing will be taken off calendar. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Telephonic appearances will be allowed if the parties have submitted a joint statement in a timely fashion. Failure to do so may result in sanctions. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: April 2, 2014 ____________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?