Penermon v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 21 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by Charlotte Penermon filed by Charlotte Penermon, Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Case referred to mediation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 3/24/14. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2014)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CASE NO. 4: 14-ev-00065-KAW
WELLS FARGO BANK,
STIPULATTON AND (J>ROPOSEJJ)
OROER SELF.CTTNG ADR PROCESS
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and AOR L.R. 3-5 :
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Cou rt Processes:
Non-binding Arbitrauon (ADR L.R. 4)
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENF.) (ADR LR. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form ofADR must parlicipale in an
ADR phone cm1ference and may not file /his .form. They must instead file a Notice of Needfor
ADR Phone Conf rence. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R 3-5)
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) - - - - -- - - - -
T he patties agree to bold the /\DR ~cssion by:
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 daysfrnm the date of the order
referring the case to an A DR process unless othenvise ordered.)
other requested deadline - -- -- - -- -- -- - - - - - - -
Dated: 03/ 17/20 14
lsi Eunj.i C~,._hwoL-_ __ _ __
Attorney for Plaintiff
/s/ Christine Hehir_ _ __ _
Attorney for Defendant
CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE
The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties· stipulation is modiJicd as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATFJUDGF.
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to usc the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation."
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?