O'Connor v. Wells Fargo, N.A.
Filing
11
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. The court ORDERS Plaintiff to respond by March 10, 2014 and explain his failure to respond to Defendant's motion to dismiss 6 . In addition, Plaintiff must simultaneously (1) submit his opposition(s) to thecourt or (2) f ile a statement of non-opposition to the motion. Show Cause Response due by 3/10/2014.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 02/28/14. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2014) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/28/2014: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (igS, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
ROBERT H. OCONNOR,
12
Plaintiff(s),
13
No. C-14-00211 DMR
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v.
14
WELLS FARGO N.A.,
15
Defendant(s).
___________________________________/
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
On February 7, 2014, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. [Docket No. 6.]
Currently, the motion is set for hearing on March 27, 2014. Plaintiff is pursuing this action without
legal representation. According to the local Court rules, Plaintiff should have filed any
brief in opposition to Defendant's motion by February 21, 2014. See N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-3. The
court has received no such opposition.
The court ORDERS Plaintiff to respond by March 10, 2014 and explain his failure to
respond to the motion. In addition, Plaintiff must simultaneously (1) submit his opposition(s) to the
court or (2) file a statement of non-opposition to the motion. This order to show cause does
not indicate that the court will necessarily accept Plaintiff's late submission. If Plaintiff does not
respond by March 10, 2014, Defendant's motion may be granted.
The court further ORDERS that Defendant shall file a reply, if any, to Plaintiff's opposition
no later than March 17, 2014.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 28, 2014
DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?