O'Connor v. Wells Fargo, N.A.

Filing 48

Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu denying 44 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply.(dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
[DOCKET NO. 44]

Plaintiff,
v.

12

WELLS FARGO, N.A.,

13

Defendant.
___________________________________/

14
15

Plaintiff Robert H. O’Connor has filed a request for an extension of time to respond to

16

Defendant Wells Fargo’s reply in support of its motion to dismiss. [Docket No. 44.] Plaintiff has

17

already filed his opposition to the motion. [Docket No. 41.] Defendant has filed a reply. [Docket

18

No. 42.] To the extent Plaintiff seeks additional time to file a surreply, Plaintiff does not have court

19

approval to file a surreply. See Civil L.R. 7-3(d) (“Once a reply is filed, no additional memoranda,

20

papers or letters may be filed without prior Court approval.”). Plaintiff’s request for an extension of

21

time is therefore denied.

u

. Ry
onna M
ge DRYU
DONNA M.
Jud

RT

27

NO

26

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

United States Magistrate Judge

ER

A

H

28

R NIA

25

Dated: September 24, 2014

FO

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LI

23

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

S

22

UNIT
ED

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
11

No. C-14-00211 DMR

ROBERT H. O’CONNOR,

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C