Meyer v. Bebe Stores, Inc.
Filing
100
ORDER REQUIRING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION re 84 MOTION to Certify Class filed by Samantha Rodriguez, Melita Meyer. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 6/22/16. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2016)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
MELITA MEYER,
Case No. 14-cv-00267-YGR
Plaintiff,
5
v.
ORDER REQUIRING SUPPLEMENTAL
BRIEFING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR
CLASS CERTIFICATION
6
7
BEBE STORES, INC.,
Re: Dkt. No. 84
Defendant.
8
9
On April 26, 2016, this Court heard oral argument on plaintiffs’ motion for class
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
certification and took the matter under submission. On May 16, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court
12
issued its opinion in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 136 S. Ct. 1540 (2016). The Court’s review of Spokeo
13
indicates that there may be significant jurisdictional issues in this matter that should be resolved
14
prior to resolution of the class certification motion. The Court therefore ORDERS the parties to
15
provide supplemental briefs as to whether plaintiffs have alleged injury-in-fact sufficiently to
16
confer Article III standing in this case in light of Spokeo. In addition, the parties are directed to
17
address these additional issues on the class certification motion:
18
19
20
21
1. Whether membership in Club Bebe establishes consent, either as to the Main Class
or the post-October 2013 sub-class?
2. The status of any discovery on the question of records from Air2Web (or other
sources) that would establish class membership.
22
Each shall file a supplemental brief not to exceed ten (10) pages by July 8, 2016.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: June 22, 2016
______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?