Meyer v. Bebe Stores, Inc.
Filing
104
ORDER DIRECTING FURTHER SUBMISSION ON PENDING MOTION TO SEAL.Filing no later than 5:00pm on Thursday, August 11, 2016. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 8/9/16. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2016)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
MELITA MEYER ET AL.,
Case No. 14-cv-00267-YGR
Plaintiffs,
5
v.
ORDER DIRECTING FURTHER SUBMISSION
ON PENDING MOTION TO SEAL
6
7
BEBE STORES, INC.,
Re: Dkt. No. 103
Defendant.
8
9
In connection with the their supplemental brief filed in support of their motion for class
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
certification, plaintiffs have submitted an Administrative Motion to File Under Seal pursuant to
12
Civil Local Rule 79-5. (Dkt. No. 103.) Civil Local Rule 79-5(e) provides:
13
14
15
16
17
If the Submitting Party is seeking to file under seal a document designated as
confidential by the opposing party or a non-party pursuant to a protective order,
or a document containing information so designated by an opposing party or a
non-party . . . [w]ithin 4 days of the filing of the filing of the Administrative
Motion to File Under Seal, the Designating Party must file a declaration as
required by subsection 79-5(d)(1)(A) establishing that all of the designated
material is sealable.
18
Civ. L. R. 79-5(e)(1). Here, no declarations in compliance with the requirement stated in Civil
19
Local Rule 79-5(e)(1) have been filed.
20
21
22
Defendant, as the Designating Party, shall file any additional declarations in support of this
motion no later than 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, August 11, 2016. Failure to file adequate
supporting declarations will result in denial of the motion at issue.
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 9, 2016
______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?