Meyer v. Bebe Stores, Inc.
Filing
99
ORDER STRIKING SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY re 97 Opposition/Response to Motion, filed by Bebe Stores, Inc.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 5/27/16. (fsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2016)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
MELITA MEYER,
Case No. 14-cv-00267-YGR
Plaintiff,
7
v.
ORDER STRIKING NOTICE OF
SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY
8
9
BEBE STORES, INC.,
Re: Dkt. No. 97
Defendant.
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Defendant has filed a “Notice of Supplemental Authority in Support of Its Opposition to
12
Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification.” (Dkt. No. 97.) The Court STRIKES the Notice as not
13
filed in compliance with Civil Local Rule 7-3(d)(2), which provides:
14
15
16
Before the noticed hearing date, counsel may bring to the Court’s attention a
relevant judicial opinion published after the date the opposition or reply was filed
by filing and serving a Statement of Recent Decision, containing a citation to and
providing a copy of the new opinion—without argument.
17
Civil L.R. 7-3(d)(2) (emphases added). All other supplementary material in support of or in
18
opposition to a motion, except for the two enumerated exceptions set forth in the Local Rules, may
19
not be filed without prior Court approval. Civil L.R. 7-3(d).
20
That being said, for judicial economy and to expedite matters, the Court will take notice of
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
the authority cited.
The Clerk shall STRIKE Docket Number 97 from the record.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 27, 2016
______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?