Meyer v. Bebe Stores, Inc.

Filing 99

ORDER STRIKING SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY re 97 Opposition/Response to Motion, filed by Bebe Stores, Inc.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 5/27/16. (fsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 MELITA MEYER, Case No. 14-cv-00267-YGR Plaintiff, 7 v. ORDER STRIKING NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY 8 9 BEBE STORES, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 97 Defendant. 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Defendant has filed a “Notice of Supplemental Authority in Support of Its Opposition to 12 Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification.” (Dkt. No. 97.) The Court STRIKES the Notice as not 13 filed in compliance with Civil Local Rule 7-3(d)(2), which provides: 14 15 16 Before the noticed hearing date, counsel may bring to the Court’s attention a relevant judicial opinion published after the date the opposition or reply was filed by filing and serving a Statement of Recent Decision, containing a citation to and providing a copy of the new opinion—without argument. 17 Civil L.R. 7-3(d)(2) (emphases added). All other supplementary material in support of or in 18 opposition to a motion, except for the two enumerated exceptions set forth in the Local Rules, may 19 not be filed without prior Court approval. Civil L.R. 7-3(d). 20 That being said, for judicial economy and to expedite matters, the Court will take notice of 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 the authority cited. The Clerk shall STRIKE Docket Number 97 from the record. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 27, 2016 ______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?