Fuller v. Evans et al
Filing
121
***DISREGARD, INCORRECT ORDER ATTACHED. SEE DOCKET NO. 123 FOR THE CORRECT ORDER.*** ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 118 Motion to Take Deposition from Marcus Alfonso Jackson. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/11/2018) Modified on 4/11/2018 (ndrS, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
DURIE TANGRI LLP
LAURA E. MILLER (SBN 271713)
lmiller@durietangri.com
ZACHARY G. F. ABRAHAMSON (SBN 310951)
zabrahamson@durietangri.com
217 Leidesdorff Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: 415-362-6666
Facsimile:
415-236-6300
Attorneys for Plaintiff
BRUCE L. FULLER
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
OAKLAND DIVISION
11
BRUCE L. FULLER,
12
13
14
15
Case No. 4:14-cv-00304-HSG
Plaintiff,
v.
J. EVANS and S. REXFORD,
Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF BRUCE L.
FULLER’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO CONDUCT DEPOSITION BY
WRITTEN QUESTIONS OF
INCARCERATED PERSON
Ctrm: 2 – 4th Floor
Judge: Honorable Haywood S Gilliam, Jr.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF BRUCE L. FULLER’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
CONDUCT DEPOSITION BY WRITTEN QUESTIONS OF INCARCERATED PERSON / CASE NO. 4:14CV-00304-HSG
1
The Court fin this matter suitable for dispositio without or argumen Pursuant to Federal
T
nds
fo
on
ral
nt.
2
Rule of Civil Procedu 31(a)(2)(B), Plaintif Bruce L. F
C
ure
ff
Fuller is here GRANT
eby
TED leave to depose by
3
written questions inm Lewis Marquis Bur CDCR #
q
mate
M
rns,
#AG6999, a person confi
fined at Calif
fornia Men’s
s
4
Colony.
5
IT IS SO OR
T
RDERED.
6
7
Dated: April 11, 2018
A
HO
ONORABLE HAYWOO S. GILLIAM, JR.
E
OD
UNITED S
STATES DI
ISTRICT JU
UDGE
8
9
10
0
11
12
2
13
3
14
4
15
5
16
6
17
7
18
8
19
9
20
0
21
22
2
23
3
24
4
25
5
26
6
27
7
28
8
1
ORDER GRA
ANTING PLAI
INTIFF BRUC L. FULLER UNOPPOS
CE
R’S
SED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
N
E
CO
ONDUCT DEPOSITION BY WRITTEN QU
UESTIONS OF INCARCER
F
RATED PERSO / CASE NO 4:14ON
O.
CV-00304-H
HSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?