Fuller v. Evans et al

Filing 127

ORDER DIRECTING RESPONSE FROM PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL. Reset Deadline as to 126 MOTION to Withdraw : Responses due by 5/29/2018. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 5/23/2018. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BRUCE L. FULLER, Plaintiff, 8 J. EVANS, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 126 Defendants. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California ORDER DIRECTING RESPONSE FROM PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL v. 9 10 Case No.14-cv-00304-HSG 12 13 Plaintiff Bruce Fuller was proceeding pro se in this case until August 1, 2017, when the 14 Court appointed pro bono counsel. See Dkt. No. 99. Because Plaintiff is represented, only his 15 attorneys should be in communication with the Court. See U.S. v. Mujahid, 799 F.3d 1228, 1236 16 (9th Cir. 2015) (finding that district court acted within its discretion in declining to grant request 17 made pro se by a litigant who was then represented by counsel); McCullogh v. Graber, 726 F.3d 18 1057, 1059 n.1 (9th Cir. 2013) (declining to consider pro se filings by a represented plaintiff); 19 Greenspan v. IAC/Interactivecorp, No. 14-cv-04187-RMW, 2016 WL 9185281, at *1 n.1 (“Pro se 20 filings by a represented party are improper.”) (N.D. Cal. May 5, 2016) (citing U.S. v. 21 Gwiazdzinski, 141 F.3d 784, 787 (7th Cir. 1998) and Mitchell v. Senkowski, 489 F. Supp. 2d 147, 22 150 (N.D.N.Y. 2006)). Nevertheless, on May 18, 2018, Plaintiff—apparently intending to act pro 23 se—filed a motion to withdraw the civil complaint against Defendants, requesting that the court 24 “vacate any[] and all further proceedings pertaining to this matter.” See Dkt. No. 126 at 1 25 (original emphasis). 26 // 27 // 28 // 1 2 3 4 The Court DIRECTS counsel for Plaintiff to respond to the May 18 filing. Plaintiff’s counsel shall file a response of no more than three pages by May 29, 2018. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 5/23/2018 5 6 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?