Fuller v. Evans et al
Filing
127
ORDER DIRECTING RESPONSE FROM PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL. Reset Deadline as to 126 MOTION to Withdraw : Responses due by 5/29/2018. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 5/23/2018. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2018)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
BRUCE L. FULLER,
Plaintiff,
8
J. EVANS, et al.,
Re: Dkt. No. 126
Defendants.
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
ORDER DIRECTING RESPONSE
FROM PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL
v.
9
10
Case No.14-cv-00304-HSG
12
13
Plaintiff Bruce Fuller was proceeding pro se in this case until August 1, 2017, when the
14
Court appointed pro bono counsel. See Dkt. No. 99. Because Plaintiff is represented, only his
15
attorneys should be in communication with the Court. See U.S. v. Mujahid, 799 F.3d 1228, 1236
16
(9th Cir. 2015) (finding that district court acted within its discretion in declining to grant request
17
made pro se by a litigant who was then represented by counsel); McCullogh v. Graber, 726 F.3d
18
1057, 1059 n.1 (9th Cir. 2013) (declining to consider pro se filings by a represented plaintiff);
19
Greenspan v. IAC/Interactivecorp, No. 14-cv-04187-RMW, 2016 WL 9185281, at *1 n.1 (“Pro se
20
filings by a represented party are improper.”) (N.D. Cal. May 5, 2016) (citing U.S. v.
21
Gwiazdzinski, 141 F.3d 784, 787 (7th Cir. 1998) and Mitchell v. Senkowski, 489 F. Supp. 2d 147,
22
150 (N.D.N.Y. 2006)). Nevertheless, on May 18, 2018, Plaintiff—apparently intending to act pro
23
se—filed a motion to withdraw the civil complaint against Defendants, requesting that the court
24
“vacate any[] and all further proceedings pertaining to this matter.” See Dkt. No. 126 at 1
25
(original emphasis).
26
//
27
//
28
//
1
2
3
4
The Court DIRECTS counsel for Plaintiff to respond to the May 18 filing. Plaintiff’s
counsel shall file a response of no more than three pages by May 29, 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 5/23/2018
5
6
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?