Kaplan et al v. Onforce, Inc. et al

Filing 26

ORDER granting 18 STIPULATION selecting Private ADR. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 4/28/14. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2014)

Case4:14-cv-00448-JSW Document18 Filed04/23/14 Page1 of 4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Scott Kaplan and Nancy
Schwartz
,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
OnForce, Inc. and OnForce
,
Services, Inc.
Defendant(s).
_______________________________/

CASE NO. ______________________
3:14-cv-00448-NC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
9
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
9
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
9
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
The parties have agreed to
✔
9
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
private mediation, likely through JAMS, and are in the process of coordinating further.
_____________________________________________________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
9
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
✔
9

120 days from date of referring case to ADR process
other requested deadline _____________________________________________

Dated:___________
4/23/14

____________________________
/s/ Glenn Peterson
Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated:____________
4/23/14

____________________________
/s/ Laurel Kilgour
Attorney for Defendant

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE

Case4:14-cv-00448-JSW Document18 Filed04/23/14 Page2 of 4
[PROPOSED] ORDER
9
9

The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 28, 2014

__________________________________
Nathanael Cousins
MAGISTRATE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”

Rev. 12/11
Page 2 of 2