Vargas v. Credit Bureau of Northern California Collection Services, Inc. et al
Filing
26
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO ADR UNIT FOR ASSESSMENT TELEPHONE CONFERENCE TO BE HELD NO LATER THAN JUNE 10, 2014. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 5/29/14. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2014)
1
2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
6
7
DAVID J. VARGAS,
Plaintiff,
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
v.
Case No. 14-cv-0467 YGR
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO
ADR UNIT FOR ASSESSMENT
TELEPHONE CONFERENCE
CREDIT BUREAU OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
COLLECTION SERVICES, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
12
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR Local Rule 2-3, the Court refers the above13
styled civil action to the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Unit for a telephone conference to
14
15
16
17
assess this case=s suitability for court-sponsored mediation, settlement conference, early neutral
evaluation, or other ADR methods. Plaintiff and Defendants= counsel shall participate in a
telephone conference, to be scheduled by the ADR Unit to occur as soon as possible but no later
than June 10, 2014.
18
The parties need not submit written materials to the ADR Unit for the telephone
19
conference, but counsel for all parties shall (1) discuss ADR options with their clients before the
20
telephone conference, and (2) attend the conference prepared to discuss their respective clients'
21
amenability to ADR processes and their prospects for settlement.
22
The ADR Unit will notify the parties of the date and time the telephone conference will be
23
held. After the telephone conference, the ADR Unit will advise the Court of its recommendation
24
for further ADR proceedings.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
28
Dated: May 29, 2014
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?