Vargas v. Credit Bureau of Northern California Collection Services, Inc. et al

Filing 26

ORDER REFERRING CASE TO ADR UNIT FOR ASSESSMENT TELEPHONE CONFERENCE TO BE HELD NO LATER THAN JUNE 10, 2014. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 5/29/14. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 7 DAVID J. VARGAS, Plaintiff, 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 v. Case No. 14-cv-0467 YGR ORDER REFERRING CASE TO ADR UNIT FOR ASSESSMENT TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CREDIT BUREAU OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA COLLECTION SERVICES, INC., et al., Defendants. 12 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR Local Rule 2-3, the Court refers the above13 styled civil action to the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Unit for a telephone conference to 14 15 16 17 assess this case=s suitability for court-sponsored mediation, settlement conference, early neutral evaluation, or other ADR methods. Plaintiff and Defendants= counsel shall participate in a telephone conference, to be scheduled by the ADR Unit to occur as soon as possible but no later than June 10, 2014. 18 The parties need not submit written materials to the ADR Unit for the telephone 19 conference, but counsel for all parties shall (1) discuss ADR options with their clients before the 20 telephone conference, and (2) attend the conference prepared to discuss their respective clients' 21 amenability to ADR processes and their prospects for settlement. 22 The ADR Unit will notify the parties of the date and time the telephone conference will be 23 held. After the telephone conference, the ADR Unit will advise the Court of its recommendation 24 for further ADR proceedings. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: May 29, 2014 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?