San Jose Options, Inc.-v-Ho Chung Yeh

Filing 34

ORDER Granting 33 Request to Appear by Telephone, filed by Ho Chung Yeh. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 07/28/2014. (kawlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 SAN JOSE OPTIONS INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 vs. HO CHUNG YEH, an individual, a/k/a SEBASTIAN, a/k/a MIKE, d/b/a PAINTBARFACTORY, d/b/a PAINTBARFACTORY.COM, d/b/a PERSPICACATY INTERNATIONAL CORP., a sole proprietorship, and DOES 1-10, inclusive Defendants. CASE NO. C 14-00500 KAW [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S LEAD COUNSEL, ANDRES QUINTANA, ESQ., PERMISSION TO PARTICIPATE IN HEARING BY TELEPHONE Date: August 21, 2014 Time: 11:00 a.m. Place: Courtroom 4 Judge: Honorable Kandis Westmore Location: Oakland Courthouse, Courtroom 4 3rd Floor 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, CA 94612 1 TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 2 Defendant Ho Chung Yeh’s Request For His Lead Counsel To Appear Telephonically At 3 Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint [Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6)] was presented to 4 the above-titled court by electronic filing. 5 Having considered the evidence, moving papers, the declaration attached thereto, and 6 opposing and reply papers (if any), the issues having been duly heard, and having found good 7 cause, Defendant’s Request is granted as follows: 8 IT IS ORDERED: 9 Mr. Andres F. Quintana of the Quintana Law Group, APC, is granted permission to 10 participate telephonically in the August 21, 2014 hearing on Defendant Yeh’s Motion to Dismiss, 11 and shall comply with the procedures laid out in the NOTICE RE: TELEPHONIC 12 APPEARANCE PROCEDURES FOR MAGISTRATE JUDGE KANDIS A. WESTMORE for 13 that telephonic appearance. 14 15 16 17 07/28/2014 Dated: _______________ _______________________________ Honorable Kandis Westmore United States Magistrate Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?