Roe v. Frito-Lay, Inc.

Filing 23

AMENDED ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 7/28/14. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2014)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

JANE ROE,

Case No. 14-cv-00751-JSW
Plaintiff,

8
v.

AMENDED ORDER SCHEDULING
TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS

9
10

FRITO-LAY, INC.,
Defendant.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13

Following the Case Management Conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case

14

Management Statement is adopted, except as expressly modified by this Order. It is further

15

ORDERED that:

16

A.

DATES

17

Jury Trial Date: Monday, February 1, 2016, at 8:00 a.m., 10 days

18

Jury Selection: Wednesday, January 27, 2016, at 8:00 a.m.

19

Pretrial Conference: Monday, January 11, 2016 at 2:00 a.m.

20

Hearing on Dispositive Motions: Friday, October 30, 2015, at 9:00 A.M.

21

Hearing on Motion for Class Certification: Friday, February 13, 2015, at 9:00 A.M.

22

Close of ALL Discovery: August 7, 2015

23

B.

DISCOVERY

24

The parties are reminded that a failure voluntarily to disclose information pursuant to

25

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) or to supplement disclosures or discovery responses

26

pursuant to Rule 26(e) may result in exclusionary sanctions. Thirty days prior to the close of non-

27

expert discovery, lead counsel for each party shall serve and file a certification that all

28

supplementation has been completed.

1

[Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(d), no formal discovery shall be initiated

2

by any party until after the meet and confer session by Rule 26(f), except by stipulation of the

3

parties or by prior court order. As soon as a party has notice of this Order, however, the party

4

shall take such affirmative steps as are necessary to preserve evidence related to the issues

5

presented by the action, including, but not limited to, interdiction of any document-destruction

6

programs and any ongoing erasures of e-mails, voice mails, and other electronically-recorded

7

material.]

8

C.

9

By agreement of the parties, this matter is referred to private ADR, to be completed by

10

September 15, 2014. The parties shall promptly notify the Court whether the case is resolved.

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 28, 2014
______________________________________
JEFFREY S. WHITE
United States District Judge

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2