Roe v. Frito-Lay, Inc.

Filing 24


Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JANE ROE, Case No. 14-cv-00751-JSW Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 FRITO-LAY, INC., SECOND AMENDED ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS Defendant. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 Following the Case Management Conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case 14 Management Statement is adopted, except as expressly modified by this Order. It is further 15 ORDERED that: 16 A. DATES 17 Jury Trial Date: Monday, February 1, 2016, at 8:00 a.m., 10 days 18 Jury Selection: Wednesday, January 27, 2016, at 8:00 a.m. 19 Pretrial Conference: Monday, January 11, 2016, at 2:00 p.m. 20 Hearing on Dispositive Motions: Friday, October 30, 2015, at 9:00 A.M. 21 Hearing on Motion for Class Certification: Friday, February 13, 2015, at 9:00 A.M. 22 Close of ALL Discovery: August 7, 2015 23 B. DISCOVERY 24 The parties are reminded that a failure voluntarily to disclose information pursuant to 25 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) or to supplement disclosures or discovery responses 26 pursuant to Rule 26(e) may result in exclusionary sanctions. Thirty days prior to the close of non- 27 expert discovery, lead counsel for each party shall serve and file a certification that all 28 supplementation has been completed. 1 C. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION 2 By agreement of the parties, this matter is referred to private ADR, to be completed by 3 September 15, 2014. The parties shall promptly notify the Court whether the case is resolved. 4 D. PROCEDURE FOR AMENDING THIS ORDER 5 No provision of this order may be changed except by written order of this court upon its 6 own motion or upon motion of one or more parties made pursuant to Civil. L. R. 7-1 or 7-1-(b) 7 without a showing of very good cause. If the modification sought is an extension of a deadline 8 contained herein, the motion must be brought before expiration of that deadline. The parties may 9 not modify the pretrial schedule by stipulation. A conflict with a court date set after the date of this order does not constitute good cause. The parties are advised that if they stipulate to a change 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 in the discovery schedule, they do so at their own risk. The only discovery schedule that the Court 12 will enforce is the one set in this order. Additionally, briefing schedules that are specifically set 13 by the court may not be altered by stipulation; rather the parties must obtain leave of Court. 14 15 16 17 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 29, 2014 ______________________________________ JEFFREY S. WHITE United States District Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?