Robinson v. Open Top Sightseeing San Francisco, LLC

Filing 38

ORDER by Judge Hamilton denying 32 Motion to Dismiss (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 HAROLD ROBINSON, Plaintiff, 8 9 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS OPEN TOP SIGHTSEEING SAN FRANCISCO, LLC, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 v. No. C 14-0852 PJH 12 Defendant. _______________________________/ 13 14 Defendant’s motion to dismiss came on for hearing before this court on July 23, 15 2014. Plaintiff Harold Robinson (“plaintiff”) appeared through his counsel, Joel Young. 16 Defendant Open Top Sightseeing San Francisco, LLC (“defendant”) appeared through its 17 counsel, Michael Purcell. Having read the papers filed in conjunction with the motion and 18 carefully considered the arguments and relevant legal authority, and good cause 19 appearing, the court hereby DENIES defendant’s motion to dismiss for the reasons stated 20 at the hearing. 21 While the court finds that the majority of plaintiff’s allegations are not sufficient to 22 meet the “interstate commerce” element of his first cause of action, the allegation that 23 defendant “sells tour packages to out-of-state individuals and/or groups” is arguably 24 sufficient to meet the “interstate commerce” element. The court also finds that plaintiff’s 25 allegations are sufficient to allege willfulness. Accordingly, defendant’s motion is DENIED. 26 However, the court notes that neither issue is foreclosed from further litigation on the 27 merits, because while plaintiff’s allegations are sufficient for pleading purposes, they will 28 need to be supported by actual evidence after discovery. 1 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 23, 2014 ______________________________ PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?