Verde Media Corp. v. Levi et al

Filing 54

ORDER STRIKING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED BY KRISTI LUHAR re 53 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Kristi Luhar. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 7/30/14. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 VERDE MEDIA CORP., 9 Plaintiff, vs. 10 11 Northern District of California United States District Court 12 13 Case No. 14-cv-00891 YGR ORDER STRIKING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED BY DEFENDANT KRISTI LUHAR RON LEVI, ARDESHIR S. AKHAVAN, HARKLET ENTERPRISES, LTD., NUNATON COMPANY, LTD., INTERNET BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC, NAUTELL CAPITAL LTD., CASH TRAFFIC LTD., AND ALACRE TRADING LTD., 14 Defendants. 15 Defendant Kristi Luhar filed a motion for summary judgment on July 29, 2014. (Dkt. No. 16 53.) The filing does not comply with this Court’s Standing Order in Civil Cases at paragraph 9(a). 17 The motion is STRICKEN on those grounds.1 18 The Court further notes that the motion does not comply with this Court’s Standing Order in 19 Civil Cases at paragraph 9(c) (requiring a separate statement of facts), and the declaration in support 20 does not comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5 concerning submission under seal of evidence in a 21 redacted form. Counsel must correct such deficiencies in any future filing. 22 23 24 The Clerk shall strike Dkt. No. 53 from the record. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: July 30, 2014 25 _______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 26 27 28 1 The Court notes that the Northern District of California’s Guidelines for Professional Conduct ( direct that counsel file a motion only after engaging in a good faith effort to resolve the issue by meeting and conferring with the opposing party or parties in advance. See Guideline 10, Motion Practice.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?