Kellogg v. General Mills, Inc.
Filing
35
ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 34 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Initial Case Management Conference re 10 Clerks Notice, filed by Daniel Kellogg, General Mills, Inc., ***Deadlines terminated. 34 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Initial Case Management Conference re 10 Clerks Notice, filed by Daniel Kellogg, General Mills, Inc. The Case Management Conference set for 6/9/14 is VACATED. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 6/2/14. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
David T. Biderman, Bar No. 101577
DBiderman@perkinscoie.com
Charles C. Sipos (pro hac vice)
CSipos@perkinscoie.com
Mica D. Simpson (pro hac vice)
MSimpson@perkinscoie.com
PERKINS COIE LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2400
San Francisco, CA 94111-4131
Telephone: 415.344.7000
Facsimile: 415.344.7050
Attorneys for Defendant
General Mills, Inc.
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - OAKLAND DIVISION
10
11
DANIEL KELLOGG,
Case No. 4:14-CV-00939-YGR
12
Plaintiff,
ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION TO
CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
13
v.
14
GENERAL MILLS, INC.,
15
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
20
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties dated May 29, 2014, and good cause appearing,
the Court hereby orders as follows:
1.
The Case Management Conference currently scheduled for June 9, 2014, is
21
, along with the June 2, 2014, date for submission of a Case
22
23
24
Management Statement.
2.
The Court will set a date for a Case Management Conference as necessary after it
has issued its ruling on General Mills’ pending Motion [Dkt. No. 25].
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: June 2, 2014
27
28
_____________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
-1ORDER GRANTING CMC CONTINUANCE
14577-0070/LEGAL120398625.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?